Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Random thoughts ... > >> A Committer is considered emeritus by their own declaration or by >> not contributing in any form to the project for over four months > > I vaguely recall six months 8-). Not that I see any problem in four, > just curious why you've changed it. > > I appreciate that you've left out any automatic promotion from > committer to PMC member, even vaguely hinted ones like "typically > happens after six months".
I would preffer it qualified as "six months of active contributions". ( instead of just six months since he becomes committer ). I would include the time before becomming committer. Contribution = code, review, docs, mailing list > Which kind of vote would require consensus? Adoption of a new > codebase as subproject (something the bylaws do not cover yet, not > that I think that's bad). AFAIK adopting a codebase is a majority decision in jakarta. I personally preffer we define "consensus" as 2/3 - instead of unanimity. Removing a PMC member or breaking a veto or changing the charter should be done with a 2/3 vote, and I would add a requirement on asking for board feedback. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
