On 12/9/00 2:42 PM, "Sean Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are standard extensions "suppressed" in this way? I checked the
> FAQ and gave a cursory search of the user archives and didn't find
> answer.
Under JDk 1.2 -- there's no reason they should be masked as items in the
/lib/ext directory are essentially on the bootclasspath and come ahead of
any user defined classpath entries unless you are using some pretty funky
options -- or are using tools that aren't Java based and don't know about
the lib/ext concept.
.duncan
--
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!try; do()
