How is using the delete task better than having it deleted via the
default behaviour?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lisa Knee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 17 October 2002 1:56 p.m.
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: Re: updating jar files with each build
> 
> Yes, I saw that, and ideally it would work that way but I found that
the
> delete task worked better.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> lisa
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kris Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ant Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:41 PM
> Subject: RE: updating jar files with each build
> 
> 
> Maybe this will help,  the <jar> task documentation states this:
> 
> "The update parameter controls what happens if the JAR file already
> exists. When set to yes, the JAR file is updated with the files
> specified. When set to no (the default) the JAR file is overwritten.
An
> example use of this is provided in the Zip task documentation."
> 
> Kris
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lisa Knee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:54 PM
> > To: Ant Users List
> > Subject: updating jar files with each build
> >
> >
> > I'm new to Ant and loving it but have one simple question:
> > if a jar file is
> > being created and you want it to overwrite the old one with each new
> > compile, how do you set up your build.xml file for that?  I tried
> > update="true" in the <jar> tag, but to no avail.
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > lisa
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to