So how exactly are dependencies found then? Are dependencies only found when you instantiate something with the keyword "new"? My code is filled with objects that are instantiated from factories or services. If I simply return these objects from a service to my base code will my base code not see this class as a dependency? I use these objects all throughout the base code, so I would imagine that they would be seen as such.
-----Original Message----- From: Frank-Michael Moser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: ClassFileSet method of loading classes Aaron Kelley wrote: > > MyClass myclass = MyFactory.create(MyClass.class); > > I would think that MyClass should be seen as a dependency (given that > this line exists in my rootfileset). So am I using it wrong, or is it > something else? When you examine at the bytecode of your (root-)class you will see that writing MyClass.class is totally equivalent to Class.forName("package-of-myclass.MyClass"); In fact, in bytecode it is coded much more near to the latter form, such that looking the bytecode can't result in finding any dependencies to MyClass. Some time ago, when I started to use an obfuscator, I ran into this obstacle, too. Frank-Michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
