"Some countries don't agree with a rule, therefore there should be no rules"
"Absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or purpose"
"Absence of any form of authority."
"Absence of any form of authority."
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] *** Re: Abuse Police
From: ox <an...@ox.co.za>
Date: Fri, August 25, 2017 12:10 am
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
What argument in favor of anarchy?
Are you confused or a troll?
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 07:00:54 -0700
" " <phish...@storey.xxx> wrote:
> Your argument in favour of anarchy does not apply in real life, so
> why should it apply on the internet.
>
> Some people might think robbing banks is ok because the banks can
> afford it. That doesn't mean laws aren't enacted because "not
> everyone" agrees with it.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Police
> > From: ox <an...@ox.co.za>
> > Date: Thu, August 24, 2017 10:04 pm
> > To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
> >
> >
> > Hmm, if it is spam malware, in .ru for example (and many other
> > countries), it may actually be be legal software. so, no.. too
> > general
> >
> > maybe you mean slavery, cannibalism & child abuse?
> > (then, the Internet may be used to assist in the crimes similar to a
> > car used to assist in a robbery...)
> >
> > Which specific Internet abuse qualifies for "internationally agreed
> > prohibited items" ?
> >
> > and the real question still remains: "how tech should respond to
> > abhorrent content, and whether content should be policed by
> > registrars, browsers, or social networks"
> >
> > I say no. Whichever region law enforcement should enforce laws. Not
> > huge multinational companies enforcing their monoculture on the
> > world.
> >
> > Andre
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:58:47 +0530
> > Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > With a few exceptions you are correct - Child abuse material,
> > > malware and such, where there is broad international consensus
> > >
> > > > On 24-Aug-2017, at 2:09 PM, Vittorio Bertola
> > > > <vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There can be no such thing as "internationally agreed prohibited
> > > > items", as these are highly cultural. Even just inside the EU,
> > > > for example, there
> > >
> >
> >
> >
