On 15/04/19, 9:26 AM, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of ac" <anti-abuse-wg-boun...@ripe.net on behalf of a...@main.me> wrote: > Sorry for top posting, but I fail to see how any of this is abuse related? Given that it is RFG raising this, I think it is a pretty safe bet that this ASN is associated with some abusive activity that he has seen.
- [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of the Interne... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of th... Sascha Luck [ml]
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries o... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteri... Sascha Luck [ml]
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mys... ac
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mys... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg... ac
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [anti-abus... Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg
- Re: [anti-... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [anti-... Siyuan Miao
- Re: [anti-... Gert Doering
- Re: [anti-... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of th... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Mysteries of th... Richard Clayton