Hi Brian, All,
This is a doubt i have about the PDP:
If concerns are addressed within a new text version, aren't people that
have opposed the previous version required to state if they agree or
not that their concerns were addressed...?
If those opposing remain silent the default interpretation will be that
they are still opposing the proposal, even if the text they have opposed
to is not there anymore?
Can you please clarify?
Thanks,
Carlos
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Brian Nisbet wrote:
(...)
one. can we assume that the co-chairs and marco have memory, or do we all
need to restate our views, maybe even after reading a new version?
Yes, you can assume this.
I mean, we would, of course, strongly suggest that people read the new version,
as we're sure you all will, and we're sure the authors would appreciate knowing
if this version is better or worse, from the point of view of the members of
the WG, but yes, we have memory.
Obviously if we reach a Concluding Phase and the Co-Chairs determination is
other than what any member believes it should be, there are further
opportunities to comment at that point.
Thanks,
Brian
Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
