I think the proposed policy tightens things up well to markedly improve the chance of abuse reports being appropriately handled. As such I am in favour of 2019-04 and feel that a slightly more detailed but not too onerous process will mean less work for abuse handlers in the long run rather than leaving things as they are.
Liam Glover National Cyber Crime Unit > On 16 May 2019, at 12:20, Marco Schmidt <mschm...@ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-04, "Validation of "abuse-mailbox"", is now > available for discussion. > > This proposal aims to have the RIPE NCC validate "abuse-c:" information more > often, and introduces a new validation process that requires manual input > from resource holders. > > You can find the full proposal at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-04 > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to > the proposer. > > At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the > Anti-Abuse Working Group Chairs, decides how to proceed with the proposal. > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> before 14 June 2019. > > Kind regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum >
