You don't know that it was "marginal" support, because no count was ever
conducted.
The Chair never asked for a "vote", and then when people didn't "vote"
(because they had never been asked to), they concluded (wrongly) that
there was no support for the proposal.
On 5/10/2020 8:51 pm, Alex de Joode wrote:
Jordi,
The proposal received a lot of push back. Your statement "some clear
support for the policy during the discussion phase", is missing the
word "marginal" between some and clear.
I believe the Anti-Abuse WG Co-Chairs made the right call. Please
consider retracting your appeal.
--
IDGARA | Alex de Joode | a...@idgara.nl | +31651108221
On Mon, 05-10-2020 10h 23min,
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> wrote:
Hi all,
This appeal (attached in PDF) follows the process outlined by
ripe-710 (RIPE PDP).
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be
privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
communication and delete it.
