Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK --------------------------------------------- on 01.9.13 6:52, Miroslav Antic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > > Mounting an attack of this sort is not simple. In the case of the > World Trade Center, the collapse of the towers indicates massive > delayed explosions. This means either the planes were loaded with > explosives or that massive explosive charges were planted in the > buildings to go off later. This is supposition, but a secondary > explosion is a necessary factor for explaining the collapse. ... Nope! This is wrong. I just saw one of the numerous emissions here dealing with the incident, where they have been explaining how possible some things can be like how a plane can hit a law and a high building and how such a building can collapse like WTC did. In fact, the two towers had, like buildings here have a steel frame outside which is connected with a grid for each floor but has no coloumns inside except a central steel pipe. It suffice that the central pipe is cut somewhere (the metal to melt, needs around 600 degrees C) and any building will collapse the same way. ------------------------------------------------- This Discussion List is the follow-up for the old stopnato @listbot.com that has been shut down ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9spWA Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email was sent to: archive@jab.org T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
