HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------
 
Subject: [Cuba SI] Saul Landau -US Double Standards on Terrorists

rom: "Karen Wald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Do Unto Others
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:20:15 -0500

US DOUBLE STANDARDS ON TERRORISTS
By Saul Landau

In light of the US anti-terrorist campaign and the recent sentencing of
[5?] spies in south Florida whom the Cuban government sent to stop
terrorism, we need clarity: about words, facts and motives. It appears
as if some US officials, pious Christians mostly, have memorized only
the first three words of their religion's moral dictum: "Do Unto
Others."

Since September 11, self-righteous discourse has reverberated about the
evil done to us. Yes, in a few hours, we lost several thousand people,
jobs, and perhaps our national innocence. But what the Al-Qaeda
terrorists did to New York and Washington, our agents have done to
other peoples and places; or we have licensed others to do our
terrorism. Indeed, some of the terrorism was planned and even carried
out in the United States.

Post 1959 US-Cuban relations offer a most dramatic illustration of
this point. Just as the Al-Qaeda fanatics expressed their hatred for
our system -- although it's still not clear what the United States had
done to them -- by destroying the twin towers and a piece of the
Pentagon, so too did the CIA aid and abet anti-Castro fanatics to bomb,
commit arson and assassinations in Cuba and later, on US soil as well.
Yes, Fidel Castro had nationalized US companies, engaged with the
Soviet enemy and tried to export revolution. Although as children we
memorize the first lines of the Declaration of Independence, the
world's best argument for revolution, we have long since dropped all
support for its contents.

Indeed, beginning in 1959, the US counter-revolutionary campaign
against Castro's Cuba, took terrorist forms. Given our current state of
alert over airplane security, it would do well to recall, that the US
government encouraged Castro-hating pilots to use US territory to fly
into Cuba to drop leaflets and more dangerous objects. Imagine the US
response if anti-Americans based in Cuba should try to fly their planes
over south Florida to drop leaflets!

From 1959-1963, as declassified documents reveal, US agencies launched
or gave green lights for thousands of sabotage operations directed at
Cuban property and hundreds of assassinations missions targeting Cuban
leaders. Some of this terrorism proceeded under the umbrella of
"Operation Mongoose," launched in late 1961; other missions proceeded
under a plan called "autonomous operations." As former CIA official Sam
Halpern described these "operations," in March 2001, the CIA would
deliver explosives, weapons, boats, planes and money to anti-Castro
exiles without knowing the exiles' targets. "A violation of
tradecraft," complained Halpern, but he did it anyway, under orders
from the brothers Kennedy.

US-based planes regularly bombed and strafed Cuban targets. (Think, on
a smaller scale of course, of the Bin Laden tape where he says: "Gee, I
didn't realize the planes would do that much damage!")

In 1990, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, Cuba's economy nose
dived. The cradle-to-grave security on which Cubans had counted
disappeared. By 1991, lacking jobs and sufficient food, thousands of
Cubans propelled themselves toward Florida on inner tubes. In response
to this wave of rafters, some of whom died at sea, Brothers to the
Rescue emerged, ostensibly as volunteer pilots to spot rafters in the
dangerous waters separating Cuba and the Florida Keys and radio their
position to nearby ships.

However, by 1995, after Washington and Havana signed a Migration
Accord, the wave of rafters subsided. The Brothers changed their
mission from alleged humanitarian rescue of rafters to outright
provocation.

In the Spring of 1995, Jose Basulto, leader of Brothers to the Rescue,
filed a false flight plan, claiming a mission to the Bahamas and,
instead flew his plane from Florida to Cuba and dropped anti-Castro
leaflets over Cuban territory. On July 13, 1995, he returned to drop
religious medals on populated areas, objects that could have hit people
on the ground. Imagine how the US Air Force would have reacted to such
shenanigans! These flights coincided with a parallel campaign by
militant anti-Castro exiles to cripple Cuba's tourist economy, her
largest foreign exchange earner. Luis Posada Carriles told a New York
Times reporter that executives of the prestigious Cuban American
National Foundation had financed a scheme to plant bombs at tourist
sites.

The FBI showed little enthusiasm, however, in responding to Cuba's
request to investigate the Florida-based exiles' role in the tourist
bombings; nor did US authorities expend much energy looking into other
terrorist actions emanating from south Florida. Clinton national
security bureaucrats did plead with the Brothers to stop their over-
flights and warned them that they could be shot down. In January 1996,
one National Security Council official even wrote a letter on White
House stationary to the FAA Commissioner requesting that he suspend the
Brothers' pilots licenses for having filed false flight plans. But the
FAA, like the FBI, did nothing. And the White House did not follow up.

After getting little satisfaction from its formal demands that the
State Department stop the over-flights, Cuba threatened that there
would be grave consequences. Castro had already concluded that the US
government would not protect Cuba from Florida-based terrorism.

So, covertly, Cuba infiltrated [5] spies into south Florida. Posing
as Castro-haters, the spies penetrated some of the violent anti-Castro
groups for the purpose of thwarting their terrorist activities.

The FBI, instead of monitoring the activities of the US-based
terrorists, targeted the Cuban spies, or so-called Wasp network, whose
mission was to thwart terrorism.

Cuba's intelligence chiefs considered Brothers to the Rescue as a
serious threat to island security. So, they directed some of the spies
who were pilots to infiltrate the Brothers' operations.

On February 24, 1996, when a trio of aircraft headed for Cuba with
Brothers' boss Jose Basulto flying the lead plane, Cuban intelligence
knew of the planned over-flight; not only from the spies but from US
government sources as well. On the night before the fatal flights, at a
Washington, DC concert, Richard Nuccio, the White House's Cuba point
man, had informed two reporters that he knew of a planned over-flight
the next day. One of the reporters then called a Cuban official in
Washington to get his reaction. So, a US official had indirectly
informed the Cuban government of the Brothers' flight plan, a fact that
the prosecutors downplayed or ignored when they charged some of the
spies with complicity in murder.

On February 24, 1996, after receiving warnings from the US government
not to fly over Cuban air space and direct orders from Cuban air
control not to enter its territory, Basulto and his air partners
entered Cuban air space. Cuban MIGs took off and shot down two of the
three encroaching planes. (A debate continues as to whether the actual
shootdowns occurred over Cuban or international air space).

Ironically, Basulto's plane escaped the missile attacks. The shootdown
of the planes not only set back US-Cuba relations, but led also to the
trial of the five spies. But, seen in light of the September 11 acts,
some of the government's witnesses who testified against the five men
appear as anti-Castro equivalents of Al-Qaeda terrorists.

In 1960-61, the CIA had trained Jose Basulto as a young man in the arts
of violence, preparing him and thousands of others to invade Cuba at
the Bay of Pigs. In August 1962, a year and a half after the Bay of
Pigs fiasco, Basulto went on a CIA-authorized raid into Cuba during
which he shot at a hotel, fired into a theater, and blasted a Havana
residential section. Cubans died in this attack.

At the trial of the spies, Basulto testified that he had changed the
violent approach of his youth to that of Ghandi and Martin Luther King,
except, of course, in the case of Cuba where, he maintained, violence
was still necessary.

Why could the jury that condemned the spies not imagine those days
before and during the Bay of Pigs, when the CIA concocted an air force
that bombed and strafed Cuban targets? Why could they not envision the
thousands of occasions when Cuban victims died, when family members
mourned, when small children lost a parent? Indeed, when the US
government has brought cases to court for terrorist acts committed by
anti-Castro Cubans, often with eyewitnesses testifying to the violence,
juries have almost always acquitted the defendants. (Perhaps, given
that the south-Florida based terrorists had acted with impunity over
decades and those who have spoken against them have received threats or
worse, the jury members might have felt intimidated?)

In pre September 11 times, Washington had consistently scoffed at
Cuba's grievances. In the immediate post Bay of Pigs era, Cuba
complained of more than 75 overflights of its territory by US based
planes. "Do unto others," Washington officials might have said, "what
others cannot do unto you."

But what would the US Air Force have done -- or what would they do now
-- if unauthorized planes entered our air space? Ironically, in the
case of the Brothers, the Cuban government showed patience, giving
repeated warnings to the State Department through 1995 and into 1996.
This soft approach by Cuba was unusual in light of the terrorist air
tragedy that anti-Castro exiles had inflicted on a Cuban commercial
airliner. In October 1976, two terrorists with strong links to US
agencies blew up a Cubana Airlines passenger jet carrying 73 people.

Orlando Bosch, who co-authored that mission, now lives comfortably in
Miami, where he continues to plot terrorism against Cuba. In 1991,
George Bush I give him special dispensation to live here despite his
long history of terrorist acts and despite objections from the FBI.
Some influential Cuban-American Republicans had pleaded Bosch's case,
calling this man who had fired bazookas at commercial targets and blown
up an airplane, a "patriot."

Luis Posada Carriles, Bosch's 's co-author on the airline caper, worked
for the US government in the 1980s after his south Cuban-American
patrons bribed Venezuelan authorities to allow him to break out of
prison. He immediately went to work for Oliver North to help supply the
Nicaraguan Contras.

Posada today sits in a Panamanian jail cell with three other
violent Castro-phobes on charges of conspiring to assassinate the Cuban
leader when he visited Panama for a head of states meeting some two
years ago.

The fact that President George W. Bush has declared his intention to
rid the world of terrorists has not had an impact on the US
government's view of Bosch and Posada, who have world-class terrorist
ratings. The apparent double standard rhetoric does not appear to
bother the President when he warns other nations about the dire
consequences of harboring terrorists. He continues to protect the
violent Florida-based anti-Castroites. Indeed, Bush the President and
Jeb Bush the Florida governor have implicitly exempted anti-Castro
terrorists from the general rules regarding terrorism.

Indeed, even some anti-Castro Cubans who have spoken openly and proudly
of their violent strategies, use Florida as both a residence and
plotting headquarters. In case anyone doubts Orlando Bosch's
intentions, listen to his own words. In 1979 he proudly proclaimed
that: "You have to fight violence with violence. At times you cannot
avoid hurting innocent people." He has never renounced that tactic. In
a Dec 12, 2001 Miami New Times article Bosch told reporter Kirk Nielson
"When they attack this guy, some innocents will be killed," he
predicted, referring to the military assaults the United States would
launch two days later in the hunt for Osama bin Laden. "It's like
Churchill said: "War is a competition of cruelty.'" According to
Nielson, Bosch admitted in early December of shipping explosives to
Cuba.

Fidel Castro in a recent speech raised the apparent contradiction in
US anti-terrorist policy. "We have the right to ask," Castro declared,
"what will be done about Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch, the
perpetrators of that monstrous terrorist act [the 1976 airliner
sabotage]Öand about those who planned and financed the bombs that were
placed in the hotels in [Havana], and the assassination attempts
against Cuban leaders, which haven't stopped for a minute in more than
40 years."

The anti-Castro terrorists have not limited their damage to Cuban
targets. They have struck repeatedly in the United States, sometimes
killing US citizens and others in what has become a love of violence.

In 1970, according to the FBI, members of the Cuban Nationalist
Movement (CNM) bombed a movie theater in New York, showing my
documentary film, "Fidel." Several weeks later, the same group burned
down a theater in Los Angeles where the film was to have shown. In
1974, CNM activists bombed the Center for Cuban Studies in New York.
Sandra Levinson, its director, narrowly escaped death.

In one of the most brazen acts of terrorism, a group of CNM activists
worked with Chilean intelligence officials under General Augusto
Pinochet in September 1976 to car-bomb Orlando Letelier as he drove to
work in Washington, DC. Ronni Moffitt, a young American woman, also
died in the blast. The Cuban American National Foundation and other
Miami-based organizations raised money for the killers' legal defense.
Indeed, CANF appointed Guillermo Novo, convicted of lying about his
knowledge of the Letelier-Moffitt plot, to one of its Boards.

Cuban Americans who promoted dialogue instead of war against
revolutionary Cuba also suffered from the terrorism. Eulalio Negrin,
who called for reconciliation in the late 1970s was assassinated in New
Jersey. Carlos Muniz, a travel agent who arranged charter flights to
Cuba, was gunned down in Puerto Rico. In Miami, Emilio Milian, a
popular radio commentator had his legs blown off in an assassination
attempt. Milian took exception to the terrorist approach to dealing
with Castro.

How peculiar that as President Bush warns other nations of the
consequences of their harboring terrorists, he and his brother host a
long list of men who have done and swear they will continue to do
terrorism against Cuba. By contrast, the convicted spies did no
terrorist acts. Rather, as the trial evidence shows, they thwarted
terrorism.

At some point, a truly religious man  -- we need Martin Luther King
right now -- will instruct US rulers in the words that follow "Do unto
others." Until then, we will fight a most contradictory war against
terrorism. We deny or ignore our own terrorist actions and our
acceptance of anti-Castro terrorists on our soil, while preaching a
non-negotiable line on terrorism to everyone else.

Cuba has been the recipient of US terrorism for more than four
decades. During certain presidencies US-based terrorism against Cuba
abated, but never entirely ceased. Even during the Clinton years, the
FBI's monitoring of violent anti-Castro exiles received low priority
and government prosecutors failed to make convincing cases against
Cuban-Americans charged with conspiring to assassinate Fidel Castro,
even though the group was caught off the Puerto Rico coast on a boat
with special sniper rifles and one of the assassins admitted the nature
of his mission to a US official.

And, even when the FBI objected to freeing from detention Jose
Dionisio Suarez and Virgilio Paz, who pled guilty to conspiring to
assassinate Letelier and Moffitt in that 1976 Washington DC car
bombing, the Bush Administration overrode their objections to please
some high anti-Castro donors in south Florida.

The "Do unto others" approach worked until September 11, when
Americans realized the true horrors of terrorism. The US bombed other
countries, assassinated some of its enemies abroad and overthrew some
"disobedient" foreign governments. Cuba's revolutionary government
survived US terrorism, but its people paid a price.

Yet, neither US officials nor the mass media have conveyed a sense of
what Cuban authorities might have felt when a genuine terrorist threat
approached their air space. Instead, Washington still insists that
shooting down Basulto's air provocateurs was simply murder.

After September 11, Americans may better understand what Cubans felt
when unauthorized planes entered their air space. But that
understanding did not translate to the government prosecutor or judge
in the case of the five spies.

Cuba had sent those men to Florida to defend itself against US
based terrorists because US authorities were not fulfilling their
police function.

US officials have refused to include this logic in their terrorism
context. Fresh from victory over the Taliban, the Bush Administration
basks in a kind of asymmetrical imperial triumphalism.

So, our government continues to harbor some terrorists, as if this
policy in no way contradicted the idea that terrorism is the world's
worst sin. Periodically, a high US official warns us of another
imminent terrorist attack, but none of them mention the terrorists
within. A strange group of conservatives in the White House who ignore
Edmund Burke, the grandfather of modern conservatism. "You are
terrifying yourself with ghosts and apparitions," warned Burke, "whilst
your house is the haunt of robbers."

     ****
Saul Landau is Director of Digital Media and International Outreach for
the College of Letters, Arts and Social Sciences at the California
State Polytechnic University Pomona. His new film is MAQUILA: A TAKE OF
TWO MEXICOS

copyright © 2001 - Radio Progreso, Inc.  
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://TOPICA.COM/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to