HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: Vicki Andrada
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 4:55 PM
Subject: Fw: [inin] The strange case of Zacarias Moussaoui

to visit my home page go to:
http://www.nosanctions.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Islamic News and Information Network
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 10:47 AM
Subject: [inin] The strange case of Zacarias Moussaoui


Assalamu'alaikum,

The strange case of Zacarias Moussaoui: FBI refused to
investigate man charged in September 11 attacks

By Patrick Martin
5 January 2002

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/jan2002/mous-j05.shtml

The case of Zacarias Moussaoui raises many questions about the conduct of
the FBI and other US intelligence agencies in the period leading up the
September 11. It is the clearest example of the almost inexplicable
refusal on the part of these agencies to take any action that could have
prevented the bloodiest terrorist attack in American history.

Moussaoui was arraigned January 3 on six counts of conspiracy to commit
murder and terrorism in the September 11 attacks. A French-born man of
Moroccan Arab descent, Moussaoui refused in the name of Allah to make a
plea, and a plea of not guilty was entered for him at the request of his
public defender.

The 30-minute hearing in a federal courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia
concluded with US District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema setting a trial date
for next October, despite defense protests that this would put jury
selection around the first anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade
Center and Pentagon.

Defense lawyers suggested they would seek a change of venue from
Alexandria, only a few miles from the Pentagon where 189 people were
killed when a hijacked American Airlines jet slammed into the building on
September 11. Brinkema indicated that she was not inclined to grant a
change of venue, saying that a fair jury could be found in northern
Virginia.

Four of the six charges against Moussaoui carry the death penalty,
although he was arrested a month before the September 11 attacks and
therefore could not have played any active role in the mass murder.
Prosecutors have until March 29 to announce whether they will seek death
sentences. Moussaoui would be the first French citizen to face the death
penalty in the United States since the US Supreme Court restored the death
penalty in 1976.


FBI refusal to act

Moussaoui was arrested in Minnesota August 16 after officials of a flight
school, the Pan Am International Flight Academy in Eagan, a suburb of
Minneapolis, tipped off the FBI that he was seeking flight training on a
Boeing 747 jumbo jet.

His conduct aroused suspicion: his attitude was belligerent, he was
evasive about his personal background, he declined to speak French with an
instructor who knew the language, and he paid the $6,300 fee in cash. He
insisted on training to fly a jumbo jet despite an obvious lack of skill
even with small planes. The prospective student reportedly did not want to
learn how to take off or land, only how to steer the jet while it was in
the air.

The instructor and a vice president of the flight school briefed two
Democratic congressmen from the Minneapolis area in November about their
repeated efforts to get the FBI to take an interest in Moussaouis conduct.
Their accounts were first reported in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, then
in the New York Times December 22.

The vice president of the flight school, who briefed Minnesota Congressmen
James Oberstar and Martin Sabo, said it took four to six phone calls to
the FBI to find an agent who would help. The instructor became so
frustrated by the lack of response that he gave a prescient warning to the
FBI that a 747 loaded with fuel can be used as a bomb.


Investigation blocked in Washington

Moussaoui was detained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service on
charges of violating the terms of his visa. Local FBI investigators in
Minneapolis immediately viewed Moussaoui as a terrorist suspect and sought
authorization for a special counterintelligence surveillance warrant to
search the hard drive of his home computer. This was rejected by
higher-level officials in Washington, who claimed there was insufficient
evidence to meet the legal requirements for the warrant.

FBI agents tracked Moussaouis movements to the Airman Flight School in
Norman, Oklahoma, where he logged 57 hours of flight time earlier in 2001
but was never allowed to fly on his own because of his poor skills. This
alone should have set off alarm bells, since a confessed Al Qaeda
operative, Abdul Hakim Murad, had trained at the same school, as part of
preparations for a suicide hijack attack on CIA headquarters. Murad
testified about these plans in the 1996 trial of Ramzi Ahmed Yusef, the
principal organizer of the 1993 World Trade Center car-bombing.

Several of the September 11 hijackers had either enrolled in or visited
the Oklahoma flight school, as a more thorough investigation determined in
the aftermath of the suicide hijackings.

On August 26, FBI headquarters was notified by French intelligence that
Moussaoui had ties to the Al Qaeda organization and Osama bin Laden. Even
this report did not spur the agency to action. A special counterterrorism
panel of the FBI and CIA reviewed the information against him, but
concluded there was insufficient evidence that he represented any threat,
despite his refusal to answer questions and the French allegations.
Moussaoui was not even transferred from INS detention to FBI custody until
after September 11.

The French warning arrived on the day after the first two suicide
hijackers purchased their one-way, first class tickets for flights on
September 11. More tickets were purchased on August 26, 27, 28 and 29,
while the FBI was refusing to pursue a more intensive investigation into
Moussaoui or search his computer.

The New York Times commented December 22 that the Moussaoui case raised
new questions about why the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other
agencies did not prevent the hijackings.

FBI officials responded indirectly to this criticism, flatly denying the
account of the warning given by the flight school personnel. The notion of
flying a plane into a building or using it as a bomb never came up, one
senior official to the Washington Post January 2. It was a straight
hijacking scenario that they were worried about.

This issue is of critical importance, and the flight school instructor,
unlike the FBI, has absolutely no reason to lie. In the wake of September
11, FBI Director Robert Mueller flatly declared that the FBI had no
indication that terrorists were seeking to use hijacked airliners as
flying bombs. His assurances were accepted uncritically by the American
media. The account given by the flight school shows that these assurances
were lies.


A security stand-down

The Moussaoui case is only one of a number of indications that the US
government had ample warning that a major terrorist operation was under
way in the United States and yet did nothing to preempt or block it.

* The governments of at least four countriesRussia, Germany, Israel and
Egyptgave Washington specific warnings of terrorist attacks in the United
States involving the use of hijacked airplanes as weapons, in the months
leading up to September 11.

* The US government itself had multiple indications of the danger of
suicide hijackings, based on its own investigations into other terrorist
attacks attributed to Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network.

* The US government was monitoring the electronic communications of bin
Laden and his associates during the extensive period of advance planning
which preceded the September 11 attack.

* Several of the September 11 hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, the
alleged ringleader, were under direct surveillance by US agencies as
suspected terrorists during 2000 and 2001.Yet they were allowed to travel
freely into and out of the US and eventually carry out their plans.

September 11 took place amid a virtual stand-down of the security forces
which permits no innocent explanation. The circumstances of the terrorist
attacks deserve the most serious and conscientious investigation. Both the
Bush administration and the Democrats and Republicans in Congress have
rejected any such probe, suggesting that to question the role of the FBI,
CIA and other intelligence agencies is unpatriotic.

But the facts which are known so far point to the conclusion that
officials at the highest levels of the US government knew that a major
terrorist attack was under way and made no serious effort to prevent it.
The political motive can be inferred: they permitted an attack to go
forwardwhether they knew its full dimensions or notin order to provide the
necessary pretext for carrying out a right-wing agenda of military
intervention abroad and attacks on democratic rights at home.


======================================================================
TO SUBSCRIBE:
To subscribe please e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body type: "subscribe inin-net"

================================================================================
       ISLAMIC NEWS AND INFORMATION NETWORK: HTTP://WWW.ININ.NET

                 VISIT: HTTP://WWW.MEDIAMONITORS.NET

  WE AFFIRM THAT INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE!!!!         
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://TOPICA.COM/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to