HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

Copyright 1993 The Times Mirror Company 
Los Angeles Times

January 18, 1993 





THE OIL FACTOR IN SOMALIA; FOUR AMERICAN PETROLEUM GIANTS HAD AGREEMENTS WITH THE 
AFRICAN NATION BEFORE ITS CIVIL WAR BEGAN. THEY COULD REAP BIG REWARDS IF PEACE IS 
RESTORED
.

By MARK FINEMAN

DATELINE: MOGADISHU, Somalia


Far beneath the surface of the tragic drama of Somalia, four major U.S. oil companies 
are quietly sitting on a prospective fortune in exclusive concessions to explore and 
exploit tens of millions of acres of the Somali countryside.

That land, in the opinion of geologists and industry sources, could yield significant 
amounts of oil and natural gas if the U.S.-led military mission can restore peace to 
the impoverished East African nation.

According to documents obtained by The Times, nearly two-thirds of Somalia was 
allocated to the American oil giants Conoco, Amoco, Chevron and Phillips in the final 
years before Somalia's pro-U.S. President Mohamed Siad Barre was overthrown and the 
nation plunged into chaos in January, 1991. Industry sources said the companies 
holding the rights to the most promising concessions are hoping that the Bush 
Administration's decision to send U.S. troops to safeguard aid shipments to Somalia 
will also help protect their multimillion-dollar investments there.

Officially, the Administration and the State Department insist that the U.S. military 
mission in Somalia is strictly humanitarian. Oil industry spokesmen dismissed as 
"absurd" and "nonsense" allegations by aid experts, veteran East Africa analysts and 
several prominent Somalis that President Bush, a former Texas oilman, was moved to act 
in Somalia, at least in part, by the U.S. corporate oil stake. 

But corporate and scientific documents disclosed that the American companies are well 
positioned to pursue Somalia's most promising potential oil reserves the moment the 
nation is pacified. And the State Department and U.S. military officials acknowledge 
that one of those oil companies has done more than simply sit back and hope for pece.

Conoco Inc., the only major multinational corporation to mantain a functioning office 
in Mogadishu throughout the past two years of nationwide anarchy, has been directly 
involved in the U.S. government's role in the U.N.-sponsored humanitarian military 
effort.

Conoco, whose tireless exploration efforts in north-central Somalia reportedly had 
yielded the most encouraging prospects just before Siad Barre's fall, permitted its 
Mogadishu corporate compound to be transformed into a de facto American embassy a few 
days before the U.S. Marines landed in the capital, with Bush's special envoy using it 
as his temporary headquarters. In addition, the president of the company's subsidiary 
in Somalia won high official praise for serving as the government's volunteer 
"facilitator" during the months before and during the U.S. intervention.

Describing the arrangement as "a business relationship," an official spokesman for the 
Houston-based parent corporation of Conoco Somalia Ltd. said the U.S. government was 
paying rental for its use of the compound, and he insisted that Conoco was proud of 
resident general manager Raymond Marchand's contribution to the U.S.-led humanitarian 
effort.

John Geybauer, spokesman for Conoco Oil in Houston, said the company was acting as "a 
good corporate citizen and neighbor" in granting the U.S. government's request to be 
allowed to rent the compound. The U.S. Embassy and most other buildings and 
residential compounds here in the capital were rendered unusable by vandalism and 
fierce artillery duels during the clan wars that have consumed Somalia and starved its 
people.

In its in-house magazine last month, Conoco reprinted excerpts from a letter of 
commendation for Marchand written by U.S. Marine Brig. Gen. Frank Libutti, who has 
been acting as military aide to U.S. envoy Robert B. Oakley. In the letter, Libutti 
praised the oil official for his role in the initial operation to land Marines on 
Mogadishu's beaches in December, and the general concluded, "Without Raymond's 
courageous contributions and selfless service, the operation would have failed."

But the close relationship between Conoco and the U.S. intervention force has left 
many Somalis and foreign development experts deeply troubled by the blurry line 
between the U.S. government and the large oil company, leading many to liken the 
Somalia operation to a miniature version of Operation Desert Storm, the U.S.-led 
military effort in January, 1991, to drive Iraq from Kuwait and, more broadly, 
safeguard the world's largest oil reserves.

"They sent all the wrong signals when Oakley moved into the Conoco compound," said one 
expert on Somalia who worked with one of the four major companies as they intensified 
their exploration efforts in the country in the late 1980s.

"It's left everyone thinking the big question here isn't famine relief but oil -- 
whether the oil concessions granted under Siad Barre will be transferred if and when 
peace is restored," the expert said. "It's potentially worth billions of dollars, and 
believe me, that's what the whole game is starting to look like."

Although most oil experts outside Somalia laugh at the suggestion that the nation ever 
could rank among the world's major oil producers -- and most maintain that the 
international aid mission is intended simply to feed Somalia's starving masses -- no 
one doubts that there is oil in Somalia. The only question: How much?

"It's there. There's no doubt there's oil there," said Thomas E. O'Connor, the 
principal petroleum engineer for the World Bank, who headed an in-depth, three-year 
study of oil prospects in the Gulf of Aden off Somalia's northern coast.

"You don't know until you study a lot further just how much is there," O'Connor said. 
"But it has commercial potential. It's got high potential . . . once the Somalis get 
their act together." 

O'Connor, a professional geologist, based his conclusion on the findings of some of 
the world's top petroleum geologists. In a 1991 World Bank-coordinated study, intended 
to encourage private investment in the petroleum potential of eight African nations, 
the geologists put Somalia and Sudan at the top of the list of prospective commercial 
oil producers.

Presenting their results during a three-day conference in London in September, 1991, 
two of those geologists, an American and an Egyptian, reported that an analysis of 
nine exploratory wells drilled in Somalia indicated that the region is "situated 
within the oil window, and thus (is) highly prospective for gas and oil." A report by 
a third geologist, Z. R. Beydoun, said offshore sites possess "the geological 
parameters conducive to the generation, expulsion and trapping of significant amounts 
of oil and gas."

Beydoun, who now works for Marathon Oil in London, cautioned in a recent interview 
that on the basis of his findings alone, "you cannot say there definitely is oil," but 
he added: "The different ingredients for generation of oil are there. The question is 
whether the oil generated there has been trapped or whether it dispersed or 
evaporated."

Beginni 1986, Conoco, along with Amoco, Chevron, Phillips and, briefly, Shell all 
sought and obtained exploration licenses for northern Somalia from Siad Barre's 
government. Somalia was soon carved up into concessional blocs, with Conoco, Amoco and 
Chevron winning the right to explore and exploit the most promising ones. 

The companies' interest in Somalia clearly predated the World Bank study. It was 
grounded in the findings of another, highly successful exploration effort by the 
Texas-based Hunt Oil Corp. across the Gulf of Aden in the Arabian Peninsula nation of 
Yemen, where geologists disclosed in the mid-1980s that the estimated 1 billion 
barrels of Yemeni oil reserves were part of a great underground rift, or valley, that 
arced into and across northern Somalia.

Hunt's Yemeni operation, which is now yielding nearly 200,000 barrels of oil a day, 
and its implications for the entire region were not lost on then-Vice President George 
Bush.

In fact, Bush witnessed it firsthand in April, 1986, when he officially dedicated 
Hunt's new $18-million refinery near the ancient Yemeni town of Marib. In remarks 
during the event, Bush emphasized the critical value of supporting U.S. corporate 
efforts to develop and safeguard potential oil reserves in the region. 

In his speech, Bush stressed "the growing strategic importance to the West of 
developing crude oil sources in the region away from the Strait of Hormuz," according 
to a report three weeks later in the authoritative Middle East Economic Survey.

Bush's reference was to the geographical choke point that controls access to the 
Persian Gulf and its vast oil reserves. It came at the end of a 10-day Middle East 
tour in which the vice president drew fire for appearing to advocate higher oil and 
gasoline prices. 

"Throughout the course of his 17,000-mile trip, Bush suggested continued low (oil) 
prices would jeopardize a domestic oil industry 'vital to the national security 
interests of the United States,' which was interpreted at home and abroad as a sign 
the onetime oil driller from Texas was coming to the aid of his former associates," 
United Press International reported from Washington the day after Bush dedicated 
Hunt's Yemen refinery.

No such criticism accompanied Bush's decision late last year to send more than 20,000 
U.S. troops to Somalia, widely applauded as a bold and costly step to save an 
estimated 2 million Somalis from starvation by opening up relief supply lines and 
pacifying the famine-struck nation.

But since the U.S. intervention began, neither the Bush Administration nor any of the 
oil companies that had been active in Somalia up until the civil war broke out in 
early 1991 have commented publicly on Somalia's potential for oil and natural gas 
production. Even in private, veteran oil company exploration experts played down any 
possible connection between the Administration's move into Somalia and the corporate 
concessions at stake.

"In the oil world, Somalia is a fringe exploration area," said one Conoco executive 
who asked not to be named. "They've overexaggerated it," he said of the geologists' 
optimism about the prospective oil reserves there. And as for Washington's motives in 
Somalia, he brushed aside criticisms that have been voiced quietly in Mogadishu, 
saying, "With America, there is a genuine humanitarian streak in us . . . that many 
other countries and cultures cannot understand."

But the same source added that Conoco's decision to maintain its headquarters in the 
Somali capital even after it pulled out the last of its major equipment in the spring 
of 1992 was certainly not a humanitarian one. And he confirmed that the company, which 
has explored Somalia in three major phases beginning in 1952, had achieved "very good 
oil shows" -- industry terminology for an exploration phase that often precedes a 
major discovery -- just before the war broke out.

"We had these very good shows," he said. "We were pleased. That's why Conoco stayed 
on. . . . The people in Houston are convinced there's oil there."

Indeed, the same Conoco World article that praised Conoco's general manager in Somalia 
for his role in the humanitarian effort quoted Marchand as saying, "We stayed because 
of Somalia's potential for the company and to protect our assets."

Marchand, a French citizen who came to Somalia from Chad after a civil war forced 
Conoco to suspend operations there, explained the role played by his firm in helping 
set up the U.S.-led pacification mission in Mogadishu.

"When the State Department asked Conoco management for assistance, I was glad to use 
the company's influence in Somalia for the success of this mission," he said in the 
magazine article. "I just treated it like a company operation -- like moving a rig. I 
did it for this operation because the (U.S.) officials weren't familiar with the 
environment."

Marchand and his company were clearly familiar with the anarchy into which Somalia has 
descended over the past two years -- a nation with no functioning government, no 
utilities and few roads, a place ruled loosely by regional warlords.

Of the four U.S. companies holding the Siad Barre-era oil concessions, Conoco is 
believed to be the only one that negotiated what spokesman Geybauer called "a 
standstill agreement" with an interim government set up by one of Mogadishu's two 
principal warlords, Ali Mahdi Mohamed. Industry sources said the other U.S. companies 
with contracts in Somalia cited "force majeure" (superior power), a legal term 
asserting that they were forced by the war to abandon their exploration efforts and 
would return as soon as peace is restored.

"It's going to be very interesting to see whether these agreements are still good," 
said Mohamed Jirdeh, a prominent Somali businessman in Mogadishu who is familiar with 
the oil-concession agreements. "Whatever Siad did, all those records and contracts, 
all disappeared after he fled. . . . And this period has brought with it a deep change 
of our society.

"Our country is now very weak, and, of course, the American oil companies are very 
strong. This has to be handled very diplomatically, and I think the American 
government must move out of the oil business, or at least make clear that there is a 
definite line separating the two, if they want to maintain a long-term relationship 
here." 

Fineman, Times bureau chief in Nicosia, Cyprus, was recently in Somalia.

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to