HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the March 28, 2002
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

KOREAN AMBASSADOR ON BUSH'S SPEECH" "WE 
CONSIDER IT TO BE A DECLARATION OF WAR"

By Deirdre Griswold

When President George W. Bush took the advice of his far-
right counselors and used his State of the Union speech to 
slander North Korea, Iran and Iraq as an "Axis of Evil," his 
intent was to intimidate these countries, which are 
struggling to defend their sovereignty.

The reaction to the speech, not just from these three but 
from the whole world, was quite the opposite. Stung by 
Bush's extreme language and its hostile implications, 
governments and peoples alike condemned his words and the 
growing belligerence of the U.S. regime.

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea has lived with the 
threat of U.S. military attack for over half a century. It 
lost an estimated 3 million people when the U.S. tried to 
destroy socialist North Korea during the 1950-53 war on the 
Korean peninsula. It has many times over the years had to 
respond to saber rattling, military exercises on its 
borders, spy ships in its waters, attacks on its fishing 
boats, and other incidents emanating from the massive 
Pentagon presence surrounding this small country. The 
Koreans have refused to knuckle under to U.S. pressure, and 
they have also exercised great restraint in these trying 
circumstances.

However, Bush's words were so extreme, so bellicose, that 
they have provoked an unprecedented response from the DPRK.

"We consider Bush's State of the Union address to be a de 
facto declaration of war on the DPRK," Pak Gil Yon told 
Workers World on March 15. Ambassador Pak is the Permanent 
Representative of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 
to the United Nations. Since the U.S. has no diplomatic 
relations with North Korea, he is the highest-ranking 
official from that country stationed in the United States. 
He visited WW's editorial offices to be interviewed.

Ever since Bush's State of the Union address, said 
Ambassador Pak, there have been "shocking policy statements 
by the president, the secretary of state and the secretary 
of defense on the Korean issue."

Again, when Bush embarked on an Asian tour last month that 
took him to Japan and South Korea, the U.S. president 
"openly slandered the DPRK and its Supreme Headquarters, 
denying our political system," he added.

U.S. NULLIFIES AGREEMENTS

The ambassador drew attention to the recently aired Nuclear 
Policy Review of the U.S. Department of Defense that 
projects plans to use nuclear weapons against seven 
countries, including the DPRK. "This is a very serious 
development," underlined the ambassador, saying that it 
cancels earlier agreements between the two countries.

In a joint statement on June 11, 1993, and again in an 
agreed-on framework for further discussion toward easing 
tension on the Korean peninsula signed on Oct. 21, 1994, the 
U.S. government under the Clinton administration had agreed 
not to threaten or use nuclear weapons against the DPRK. 
Bush's recent statements are a "nullification" of these 
agreements, said the ambassador.

"If this nuclear posture is confirmed, the DPRK will be 
forced to review the framework," he said. "This is the 
position of my country."

This is not just a war of words. The Pentagon has announced 
that the U.S. and South Korea will carry out joint military 
exercises on March 21-27 that will involve many U.S. forces 
and more than 500,000 troops from South Korea in combined 
exercises. "This is very, very dangerous and adventurous and 
will create a very serious situation on the Korean 
peninsula," said Pak. He added that there had not been such 
menacing exercises since the last "Team Spirit" war 
rehearsals took place in 1993.

"We consider Bush's announcement a declaration of war 
against my country," he reiterated, "and all counter-
measures will be taken to defend the sovereignty of the 
country. We shall closely watch what the adventurous 
military brass do."

Ambassador Pak described relations between the U.S. and the 
DPRK as getting "worse and worse," and added that the inter-
Korean dialogue between the north and south is now also very 
difficult. "South Korea is a close ally of the United 
States," said the ambassador, "and the Bush administration 
is making the situation worse."

Two years ago there seemed to be a great breakthrough in the 
hostility that has characterized relations between the north 
and the U.S.-occupied south. On June 14, 2000, a historic 
agreement was signed by DPRK leader Kim Jong Il and South 
Korean President Kim Dae Jung after a summit meeting in 
Pyongyang, capital of the DPRK.

It was followed by several highly charged trips to the 
opposite side by family members in both countries who had 
been separated from close relatives for 50 years by the 
division of Korea. Since Bush's intensified belligerence 
against the north, however, the long-awaited moves toward 
normalization of relations and some degree of reunification 
have been quashed.

Instead, the DPRK must now be "in a state of high vigilance 
to defend our sovereignty," said Pak.

The economy of the DPRK has been strained for a decade by 
weather catastrophes exacerbated by the collapse of a major 
economic partner, the Soviet Union. In 1994, the Korean 
revolutionary leader Kim Il Sung, who had organized the anti-
colonial and anti-imperialist struggle since the days of 
Japanese rule, died. There was speculation in the 
imperialist media and press that the DPRK would have to 
abandon its socialist path and accommodate to U.S. demands 
in order to survive.

Instead, under the new leadership of Kim Jong Il, the Korean 
people and the Workers' Party of Korea rallied against their 
difficulties.

Referring to what Kim Jong Il has called his "army first 
policy," Ambassador Pak said that in light of the present 
threats from Washington, "We're very proud of our party 
policy, led by Comrade Kim Jong Il, which has given priority 
to defense issues so we could defend ourselves against 
aggression by the U.S."

These are serious but sober words from the representative of 
a country that knows from its own experience what war is, 
but also knows what it means to be a colony and is 
determined to resist with all its might.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to 
copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but 
changing it is not allowed. For more information contact 
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to