HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

ALLEGED BJP TOLERANCE OF BRUTALITY
Revulsion grows toward Vajpayee's party
By B. GAUTAM
Special to The Japan Times
NEW DELHI -- India's secularism is in flames. The western Indian state of Gujarat, 
perhaps the most economically prosperous region in the entire country, has been in the 
midst of communal carnage for many weeks now. The majority Hindu population there has 
been systematically butchering members of the minority Muslim group in what is 
ironically considered "the land of peace." 
It is in Gujarat that Mahatma Gandhi was born, the man who won India its independence 
from British rule in 1947 through nonviolence, which he chose to describe as ahimsa, a 
word coined thousands of years ago by Gautama Buddha. Gandhi's ashram pacifist colony 
stands to this day in Ahmedabad, the city that has been witnessing horrific brutality. 
Just one incident is enough to highlight this. Last week, a Muslim woman on her eighth 
month of pregnancy was seized by a Hindu mob, her abdomen ripped open and her fetus 
scooped out and thrown into a fire. 
The United Nations Human Rights Commission condemned the Gujarat atrocities, and said 
that they were as bad as -- if not worse than -- what happened in Nazi Germany, where 
Hitler and his men killed 6 million Jews in carrying out his "Final Solution." 
Curiously, in what is seen as an abject exercise to tutor the young and the 
impressionable in the Nazi doctrine of extermination, students of Class 12 in Gujarat 
appearing for their final examination were asked a question on Hitler's ruthless 
methodology. 
As part of an English grammar exercise, the boys and girls were asked to join the 
following sentences into one: "There are two solutions. One of them is the Nazi 
solution. If you do not like people, kill them, segregate them. Then strut up and 
down. Proclaim that you are the salt of the Earth." 
In Gujarat where hundreds of innocent Muslim men and women have been murdered, the 
perversion of an educational exercise appears to be part of a provocation process, 
which understandably led to an uproar not just within the nation, but also outside. 
Finland has made a strong protest over the handling of the Gujarat massacres, ignoring 
Indian accusation of "interference in internal affairs." 
In Britain, cases have been filed in court calling for the extradition of Narendra 
Modi, Gujarat's chief minister and a leader of the Hindu nationalist party, Bharatiya 
Janata Party. The BJP, which heads the national coalition government in New Delhi, can 
find itself on a sticky wicket, because the U.K. is in a strong position to pursue the 
demand, given the fact that a few British citizens are among those dead in Gujarat. 
The Economist news magazine, in a strong indictment of the Gujarat barbarism, has 
called the BJP "shameless." It adds: "The BJP has for several years seemed to treat 
its Hindu nationalist ideology as a political liability. Now, when that ideology is 
showing its dangerous and shameful side, the party has suddenly chosen to reaffirm 
it." 
The atrocities began as a revenge for an attack by Muslims on a train carrying Hindu 
pilgrims. About 60 of them were burned to death. In retaliation, hundreds of Muslims 
in Gujarat were "slaughtered," and according to independent reports and eyewitness 
accounts, Hindu mobs were incited and the killings were orchestrated by the Modi 
administration itself. 
Yet, the nationalist BJP has been resisting just about every conceivable move to have 
Modi removed from chief ministership. Supporting him in a shocking display of bad 
judgment is India's prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, whose reputation for 
misplaced tolerance has until now endeared the BJP, which he heads, to most coalition 
members. "The massacres are condemnable" he said, "But who lit the fire and how did it 
spread?" 
Understandably, this has produced a sense of revulsion among the nation's opposition 
parties, which refused to let Parliament function for days until it was agreed that 
Gujarat would be on the table for a debate and vote on April 30. The Vajpayee 
government is bound to face uncomfortable questions that day. 
With even some of his own coalition partners perturbed and angry over the massacres, 
Vajpayee could soon well be in hot water. 
His party's directive to Modi hold early elections in the troubled state, and the 
national BJP's tryst with the Indian electorate in 2004, when the current term of 
Parliament ends, seem to point to an uncertain future for the Hindu nationalist party. 
The Japan Times: April 26, 2002
(C) All rights reserved 

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9617B
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to