HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------

For information about upcoming peace & antiwar activities see the LMNOP
calendar at http://www.lmno4p.org/calendar.htm

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/oneworld/20021011/wl_oneworld/13343_1034350195


World - OneWorld.net 
 
U.S. Anti-War Movement Growing
Fri Oct 11,10:39 AM ET
Jim Lobe,OneWorld US 

  As both houses of the United States Congress voted Thursday to
authorize President George W. Bush to take military action against
Iraq, anti-war forces claimed that their movement was rapidly gaining
momentum around the country. 

  "We are seeing a remarkable mobilization against a war that has not
yet even begun," declared Robert Borosage, the founder-director of the
Campaign for America's Future, at a press conference sponsored by
Foreign Policy in Focus held Thursday at the National Press Club in
Washington D.C. 

  Borosage noted that more than 200 demonstrations and other protests
have taken place around the U.S. while Congress debated the resolution
agreed by Bush and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives,
Dick Gephardt, last week. 

  The resolution permits the president to use all means he deems
necessary to defend the U.S. against the "continuing threat" posed by
Baghdad. In a concession to Gephardt, it also calls for Bush to exhaust
diplomatic avenues at the United Nations Security Council before
resorting to military force, but does not require him to get the
Council's formal approval before going to war. 

  Despite Gephardt's support, a majority of Democrats in the House
voted against the resolution, which was approved by a 295-133 vote. The
Senate approved the same resolution late Thursday night by a similar
margin. 

  Anti-war activists, however, said they were encouraged by the vote,
particularly when they compared it with the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin
Resolution that formed the basis for Washington's increased involvement
in the war in Vietnam. With the exception of two senators who voted
against it, that resolution passed unanimously. 

  "This should give pause to the Administration," said Borosage. 

  Indeed, even as the administration prevailed in Congress, anti-war
forces appear to be knitting together perhaps the largest coalition of
groups opposed to U.S. military action since the Vietnam War. 

  On Tuesday, 53 mainly humanitarian and religious groups issued a
statement urging Congress to reject any resolution authorizing
preemptive, unilateral military action against Iraq. Among the signers
were such prominent grassroots organizations as Greenpeace, Oxfam
America, the National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA (which
represents some 140,000 Protestant congregations), the Union of
Concerned Scientists, and Physicians for Social Responsibility. 

  "We believe that a unilateral, preemptive strike against Iraq at this
time would undermine rather than strengthen U.S. national security,"
the statement said. "We are concerned that such action could actually
heighten the risk of terrorist attacks against U.S. citizens while
undermining international cooperation to reduce terrorism and bring to
justice those who are responsible for the attacks of September 11,
2001." 

  Also this week, John Sweeney, the head of the country's largest labor
union group, the AFL-CIO, issued a statement expressing strong
reservations about any resort to unilateral action against Iraq and
stressing that "the AFL-CIO strongly believes that our national
interests are better protected by multilateral action." During the
Vietnam War, the union was one of the strongest backers of the war
effort. 

  In addition, the National Organization for Women (NOW) and several
other feminist groups have also come out against military action. At
Thursday's press conference, NOW Vice President Olga Vives warned that
giving Bush a "blank check" to go to war would result in the diversion
of needed funds "from education, health, welfare and other vitally
needed social programs from an already downsized budget." 

  Businesspeople are also growing concerned about the drive to war,
according to Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream who is
now associated with Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities (BLSP).
Calling a war against Iraq a "deadly distraction," Cohen warned that
the country can ill afford a costly war at a time when "America totters
on the brink of a new recession." 

  "In the last week alone, our members have sent over 110,000 faxes to
their members of Congress opposing an American attack on Iraq," said
Cohen, whose BLSP has spun off a grassroots education and advocacy
project called TrueMajority. "Our membership has grown by 10,000
members in just the past 48 hours," he added. 
____________________
http://www.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

---------------------------
ANTI-NATO INFORMATION LIST

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.bacIlu
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to