------ Original Message (Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:34:09 AM) From: scott_boag ------ Subject: [antlr-interest] Dumb newbie question dept: Anyway to simulate lexical states? > So, the concrete question is, is it possible in ANTLR3 to filter out sets > of tokens based on a predicates > The short answer is, yes. Without knowing more about the problem you are having, I can only guess that you may be failing to recognize that the lexer is effectively k=1. An easy solution is to not leave gaps in predicate predictions.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
