Le 7 juillet 2011 05:08, John B. Brodie <[email protected]> a écrit : > see attached.
Many, many thanks, as your corrections on my example helped me considerably and the initial recursion is gone. I had also an obvious bug in my "NOT" expression. Now I have added some other structures like for/next and choose/case My current problem is that your refactor of my funCall rule by following an expression by a postfix notation seems not working on my test code. That looks clever, but during parsing, the Parser seem to look for a missing assignment between the function identifier and the parameter list. I did not found why yet. I join my grammar in its current state. -- Sébastien Kirche
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
PowerScript.g
Description: Binary data
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
