maybe an empty lexer rule or one that could match nothign?
Ter
On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Ben Dotte wrote:
> Sorry, it has been a while since I worked with Antlr!
>
> In that case, no I do not see any.
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Terence Parr <pa...@cs.usfca.edu> wrote:
> hi. semantic preds look like {..}? :)
> Ter
> On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Ben Dotte wrote:
>
> > Yes, there are a couple rules with semantic predicates:
> >
> > fieldSearch
> > : (TEXT ':'^)? (subSearch | negationSearch)
> > ;
> >
> > negationSearch
> > : ('-'^)? (quotedSearch | dateRangeSearch | comparisonSearch | idSearch |
> > wildcardSearch | term)
> > ;
>
>
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
