maybe an empty lexer rule or one that could match nothign? Ter On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:16 PM, Ben Dotte wrote:
> Sorry, it has been a while since I worked with Antlr! > > In that case, no I do not see any. > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Terence Parr <pa...@cs.usfca.edu> wrote: > hi. semantic preds look like {..}? :) > Ter > On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Ben Dotte wrote: > > > Yes, there are a couple rules with semantic predicates: > > > > fieldSearch > > : (TEXT ':'^)? (subSearch | negationSearch) > > ; > > > > negationSearch > > : ('-'^)? (quotedSearch | dateRangeSearch | comparisonSearch | idSearch | > > wildcardSearch | term) > > ; > > > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-inter...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to il-antlr-interest+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.