I think I understand what you intended. Thanks for clearing it up for me. /s.
-----Original Message----- From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:AOLSERVER@;LISTSERV.AOL.COM] On Behalf Of Peter M. Jansson Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] How I'll vote for core team members (long) My point was that my criteria -- and they are just mine, I don't think anyone should feel obliged to use them -- were less a set of checkboxes than a set of weighted scores, and that the scores for the individual can balance with the scores for team as a whole. If one person is weaker at coding, but stronger at community relations, it may come out as a wash, as long as there's someone else with more coding strength involved. And I really appreciate your sharing some of your criteria. It helps me think about mine more. I hope others will share, too -- that's really why I sent that note. On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 04:47 PM, Scott S. Goodwin wrote: > I read it, but sadly I had to lookup Voltron on the net. I lived > overseas at the time,
