Hi There, On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:38:15 EST, Jim Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There's no specific reason for the 32byte limit and not checking for overflow >is just a stupid oversight. AOLserver 4.0 has no limit as you suggest - the >cache structure is grown to hold the required number of bytes in the string >name. The 3.5 code could be patched to work the same way. > >-Jim > what do you mean by AOLserver 4.0. At www.aolserver.com the latest release is 3.5.1? Cheers, Niels
