In strict C terms, "int" is supposed to be the most convenient size for
the platform and sizeof( long ) >= sizeof( int ) >= sizeof( short
). It's my understanding that sizeof( int ) and sizeof( $TYPE * )
would, under most, if not all circumstances, to be the same. I would expect "int" to be 64-bit on a 64-bit platform, just like it was 16-bits in the Bad Old Days (when we had to deal with segmented memory on Intel), and 32-bits on 32-bit platforms. But I haven't had a chance to play with a 64-bit platform. Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Thu, 22 Jun 2006, schreef aT:We are using Aolserver successfully on x86_64 system . Amd opteron RHEL 3.4 64 bit to be more specificI do so as well, but only after modifying the source code. The 4.0.10 source code exits if the size of a pointer does not equal the size of an integer. On x86_64 a pointer is 8 bytes, and an integer is 4 bytes. So, if you manage to run it without modifying the source I'l like to hear how.Daniël -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
|
- [AOLSERVER] New release? Daniël Mantione
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Nathan Folkman
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Jon Griffin
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Nathan Folkman
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Jon Griffin
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Nathan Folkman
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Jim Davidson
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? aT
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Daniël Mantione
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Rick Gutleber
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Jim Davidson
- Re: [AOLSERVER] New release? Daniël Mantione