The following reply was made to PR os-qnx/2142; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: bob ostermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Subject: Re: os-qnx/2142: server becomes unresponsive despite active Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 07:04:30 -0400 >Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 07:08:16 -0400 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: bob ostermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: os-qnx/2142: server becomes unresponsive despite active >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from "bob ostermann" at May 5, 98 12:55:46 pm> > >I downloaded the 1.3b7 release, compiled and installed it. The problem still exists. Additionally, I contacted tech support at QNX and they say there's nothing wrong with their Socket implementation. > >Comments? > >At 03:59 PM 5/5/98 -0400, you wrote: >>bob ostermann wrote: >>> >>> Current Time: Tue May 5 12:34:37 1998 >>> Restart Time: Tue May 5 12:33:32 1998 >>> Server uptime: 1 minute 5 seconds >>> Total accesses: 8 - Total Traffic: 3 kB >>> CPU Usage: u.05 s0 cu0 cs0 - .0769% CPU load >>> .123 requests/sec - 47 B/second - 384 B/request >>> 2 requests currently being processed, 0 idle servers >>> >>> SW.............................................................. >>> ................................................................ >>> ................................................................ >>> ................................................................ >>> >>> Scoreboard Key: >>> "_" Waiting for Connection, "S" Starting up, "R" Reading Request, >>> "W" Sending Reply, "K" Keepalive (read), "D" DNS Lookup, >>> "L" Logging, "G" Gracefully finishing, "." Open slot with no current process >> >>Hmmm. It looks like it's being stuck in the startup phase. I'll have >>to dig deeper into this, but it sounds almost like a socket >>problem. >> >> >>-- >>=========================================================================== >> Jim Jagielski ||| [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||| http://www.jaguNET.com/ >> "That's no ordinary rabbit... that's the most foul, >> cruel and bad-tempered rodent you ever laid eyes on" >> >>
