The following reply was made to PR mod_proxy/3009; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Paul COURBIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Subject: Re: mod_proxy/3009: RemoteProxy CAN'T request an authorization
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:54:39 +0200
The same problem exists with the CONNECT method. Temporarely Idid the following
change in proxy_connect.c
126,127d125
< array_header *reqhdrs_arr; /* plc */
< table_entry *reqhdrs; /* plc */
229,242c227
< /***************** Add authorization if known *****************/
< reqhdrs_arr = ap_table_elts(r->headers_in);
< reqhdrs = (table_entry *) reqhdrs_arr->elts;
< for (i = 0; i < reqhdrs_arr->nelts; i++)
< {
< if (reqhdrs[i].key == NULL || reqhdrs[i].val == NULL
< || strcasecmp(reqhdrs[i].key, "Proxy-Authorization") )
< {
< continue;
< }
< ap_snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
< "Proxy-Authorization: %s" CRLF, reqhdrs[i].val );
< }
< ap_snprintf(buffer+strlen(buffer), sizeof(buffer)-strlen(buffer),
---
> ap_snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
244d228
< /**************************************************************/
Problem : it forward the authorization to every remote proxy... Should keep
a table of which proxy asked an auth (?)
BTW: shouldn't the User-Agent be sent to ?
Paul
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on 09/16/98):
> Thank you very much for your problem report.
> It has the internal identification `mod_proxy/3009'.
> The individual assigned to look at your
> report is: apache.
>
> >Category: mod_proxy
> >Responsible: apache
> >Synopsis: RemoteProxy CAN'T request an authorization
> >Arrival-Date: Wed Sep 16 08:20:00 PDT 1998
--
-=-=-=-=-=- Paul COURBIS -=- Responsable Systemes Informatiques -=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=- Centre de Recherche Motorola -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -=-=-=-
-=- Voice: +33 (0)1 69.35.25.37 Fax: +33 (0)1 69.35.25.01 -=-
<legal>Opinions hereabove are my own and not those of my organization</legal>
