Dean,
I agree that the implementation I presented is overly awkward
and cumbersome, but...
As I stated in my earlier, there are other, better and much
simpler requests that I hadn't seen that would support my
needs (and obviously others).
Please look at:
PR 573
PR 2772
These support simple new % escapes for method and protocol and,
of course, we are looking for a query_string (with the '?') when
it exists.
--
sam
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 13:28 EDT 1999
> Date: 21 Apr 1999 17:31:27 -0000
> To: apache-bugdb@apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_log-any/3802: would like to add an option,%R, to expand
> directory requests to include the filename within CLF
>
> [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
> [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
> [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
> [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
> [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
> [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
> [from a developer. ]
> [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
>
>
> Synopsis: would like to add an option,%R, to expand directory requests to
> include the filename within CLF
>
> State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed
> State-Changed-By: dgaudet
> State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 21 10:31:26 PDT 1999
> State-Changed-Why:
> No, I took a look at your code for %R, and to be honest it scares me.
> It looks far more complicated than a "simple change". It includes
> knowledge of how the subrequests are ordered, which is not something
> that is necessarily tied down. All the info you need is already
> available through %f -- you could post process the logs, and that
> leaves us less code to support. Sorry.
>
> Thanks for choosing Apache.
>
> Dean
