The following reply was made to PR mod_jserv/4817; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stefan Walcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ed Korthof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Stefan Walcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jserv/4817: DSO build impossible
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 19:11:49 +0100
At 08:19 05.08.99 -0700, Ed Korthof wrote:
>supporting DSOs is done by including mod_so in your build -- please check
>to see if it's present, with 'httpd -l'. If not, you need to run
>configure with --enable-module=so before building Apache.
>
>If that's not the problem, please indicate so. FYI, it is possible to
>build DSOs, at least with some configurations (this is more actively
>maintained than static compilation).
>
>hth --
>
>Ed
HI,
mod_so is included in apache, in fact as mentioned below, I did compile it with
--enable-shared=most --enable-module=max that should actually include
--enable-module=so. If I do a httpd -l only mod_core and mod_so are listed.
so the Problem seems to be somewhere else. FYI this works all fine under
debian Linux and Sparc Solaris 2.6. Maybe it is a bug in the Solaris 2.7
Environment.
>On 4 Aug 1999, Stefan Walcz wrote:
>
> > >Number: 4817
> > >Category: mod_jserv
> > >Synopsis: DSO build impossible
> > >Confidential: no
> > >Severity: non-critical
> > >Priority: medium
> > >Responsible: jserv
> > >State: open
> > >Class: sw-bug
> > >Submitter-Id: apache
> > >Arrival-Date: Wed Aug 4 06:40:00 PDT 1999
> > >Last-Modified:
> > >Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Organization:
> > apache
> > >Release: Apache 1.3.6 JServ 1.0 final
> > >Environment:
> > Java 1.2.1_03 solaris 7 Intel
> > >Description:
> > configure does not recognize that apache has been built with DSO
> support when using the
> > the --with-apache-install parameter
> > >How-To-Repeat:
> > try to build apache with --enable-shared=most --enable-module=max (or
> was it the other way around ;-)) on solaris 7
> > then try to build jserv as a module.
> > >Fix:
> > sorry no
> > >Audit-Trail:
> > >Unformatted:
> > [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
> > [to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line and make sure the]
> > [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
> > [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ]
> > ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ]
> > [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ]
> > ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ]
> > [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ]
> > [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
> > [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ]
> > [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
> >
> >
> >
-
{
{ stefan walcz
{ xmachina GmbH
{ maassstrasse 24
< 69123 heidelberg
{ 06221/822021 -> phone
{ 06221/822040 -> fax
{ http://www.xmachina.de
{
-