The following reply was made to PR os-windows/3606; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juan Oropeza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: os-windows/3606: makefile.nt needs to use $(<variable>) instead of
%<variable>%
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 11:07:53 -0800
Hello,
I noticed the new files in 1.3.4, but if you make this change to the
makefile.nt, then you will support both NT and Win95/98 without having to
maintain two sets of makefiles. I think this would be a cleaner fix to the
problem.
Thanks
Juan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
> [you need to include <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the Cc line ]
> [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done]
> [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
> [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
> [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
> [from a developer. ]
> [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
>
> Synopsis: makefile.nt needs to use $(<variable>) instead of %<variable>%
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
> State-Changed-By: pcs
> State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 30 11:47:51 PST 1999
> State-Changed-Why:
> This is really a difference between NT and Win9x. The
> makefile is designed for NT, which is why it is called
> Makefile.nt. In 1.3.4 there are separate makefiles
> for Win9x (one for a release build and one for a debug
> build). This will let you build Apache on Win9x and
> so solves this problem. Note that Apache is designed
> to be built with VC++ 5, not 6, although I would expect
> both to work.
