dgaudet 97/04/21 20:01:27
Modified: htdocs/manual/misc FAQ.html
Log:
Tweak the wording about the JDK 1.0.2 problem slightly.
Revision Changes Path
1.37 +4 -2 apache/htdocs/manual/misc/FAQ.html
Index: FAQ.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache/htdocs/manual/misc/FAQ.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -C3 -r1.36 -r1.37
*** FAQ.html 1997/04/22 02:55:43 1.36
--- FAQ.html 1997/04/22 03:01:25 1.37
***************
*** 8,14 ****
<!--#include virtual="header.html" -->
<H1>Apache Server Frequently Asked Questions</H1>
<P>
! $Revision: 1.36 $ ($Date: 1997/04/22 02:55:43 $)
</P>
<P>
If you are reading a text-only version of this FAQ, you may find numbers
--- 8,14 ----
<!--#include virtual="header.html" -->
<H1>Apache Server Frequently Asked Questions</H1>
<P>
! $Revision: 1.37 $ ($Date: 1997/04/22 03:01:25 $)
</P>
<P>
If you are reading a text-only version of this FAQ, you may find numbers
***************
*** 864,870 ****
processing a request. Unfortunately, the Java Development Kit (JDK)
version 1.0.2 URL methods (URLConnection and friends) expect to see
the version string "HTTP/1.0" and do not correctly interpret
! the "HTTP/1.1" value Apache is sending. The result is that
the JDK methods do not correctly parse the headers, and include them
with the document content by mistake.
</P>
--- 864,872 ----
processing a request. Unfortunately, the Java Development Kit (JDK)
version 1.0.2 URL methods (URLConnection and friends) expect to see
the version string "HTTP/1.0" and do not correctly interpret
! the "HTTP/1.1" value Apache is sending (this part of the
! response is a declaration of what the server can do rather than a
! declaration of the dialect of the response). The result is that
the JDK methods do not correctly parse the headers, and include them
with the document content by mistake.
</P>
