martin      98/02/18 12:39:20

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Vote; Reverse Ken's suggestion about check_cmd_context() which got lost 
around Rev.1.120
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.157     +7 -5      apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.156
  retrieving revision 1.157
  diff -u -u -r1.156 -r1.157
  --- STATUS    1998/02/18 13:55:21     1.156
  +++ STATUS    1998/02/18 20:39:19     1.157
  @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
   
       * M.D.Parker's [PATCH] mod_status/1448: Status Information have version
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  -     Status: Dean +1, Martin +1, Alexei -1 (shared lib concerns)
  +     Status: Dean +1, Martin +0 (duplicates /server-info?server),
  +             Alexei -1 (shared lib concerns)
   
       * Ralf's [PATCH] New RewriteMap types for mod_rewrite
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@
   
       * Doug's [PATCH] unbind cpu option for aix
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  -      Status: Doug +1, Jim +1
  +      Status: Doug +1, Jim +1, Martin +1
   
   Concepts:
   
  @@ -105,10 +106,10 @@
       * Provide consistant prefixes; suggestions:
   
         Apache provided general functions (e.g., ap_cpystrn)
  -     ap_xxx: Ken +1, Brian +1, Ralf +1
  +     ap_xxx: Ken +1, Brian +1, Ralf +1, Martin +1
   
         Public API functions (e.g., palloc)
  -     apapi_xxx: Ken +1, Brian +1, Ralf +1
  +     apapi_xxx: Ken +1, Brian +1, Ralf +1, Martin +1
        appublic_xxx:
        appub_xxx:
   
  @@ -154,8 +155,9 @@
       * root's environment is inherited by the Apache server. Jim, Ken &
         Dean thinks we should recommend using 'env' to build the
         appropriate environment. Marc and Alexei don't see any
  -      big deal.
  +      big deal. Martin says that not every "env" has a -u flag.
   
  +    * Ken suggests that new check_cmd_context() and related defines
         should be non-static and in util_* so modules can use 'em.  (He
         didn't notice this flaw during the review.)
   
  
  
  

Reply via email to