fielding    98/03/25 23:56:33

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Put guidelines to the vote.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.210     +12 -23    apache-1.3/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.209
  retrieving revision 1.210
  diff -u -r1.209 -r1.210
  --- STATUS    1998/03/26 04:47:53     1.209
  +++ STATUS    1998/03/26 07:56:32     1.210
  @@ -2,17 +2,22 @@
   
   Release:
   
  -    2.0  : In pre-alpha development
  -         see: <http://www.arctic.org/~dgaudet/apache/2.0/process-model>
       1.3b6: in development
       1.3b5: Tagged APACHE_1_3b5 and released
  -    1.3b4: Internal version... not tagged or released.
  -    1.3b3: Released and announced
  -    1.3b1: There is no 1.3b1
   
  -Current Modes:
  +    2.0  : In pre-alpha development, see apache-2.0 repository
   
  -    o Commit-Then-Review (see <http://dev.apache.org/guidelines.html#ctr>
  +Guidelines:
  +
  +    o For the past few months we have been working on a commit-then-review
  +      basis.  It is now time to decide whether or not we want to work
  +      under the guidelines in <http://dev.apache.org/guidelines.html>
  +      or not, and if not, what changes are needed to make it right.
  +
  +      Approve guidelines as written:
  +         +1: Roy
  +         +0:
  +         -1:
   
   Plan:
   
  @@ -299,22 +304,6 @@
        supply a dot-notation address.
   
   Closed issues:
  -
  -    * Removal of inetd mode
  -     Ken says he'll try to maintain it, since there are
  -     people/places who need it
  -
  -    * The decision has been made to experiment with allowing code
  -      changes to be committed without prior review.
  -
  -    * Guidelines for commit-then-review are documented at
  -      <http://dev.apache.org/guidelines.html>
  -
  -    * The "apache" CVS module has been renamed to "apache-1.2" and the
  -      "apachen" module to "apache-1.3".  "apache-1.3" has been copied
  -      to "apache-2.0", but whether that's appropriate or not is
  -      under discussion.  A couple of people want that module to
  -      start empty rather than full of 1.3's stuff.
   
   Open issues:
   
  
  
  

Reply via email to