jim 98/04/20 13:18:03
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Update STATUS
Revision Changes Path
1.309 +18 -13 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.308
retrieving revision 1.309
diff -u -r1.308 -r1.309
--- STATUS 1998/04/20 08:28:48 1.308
+++ STATUS 1998/04/20 20:18:02 1.309
@@ -2,10 +2,12 @@
Release:
- 1.3b7: freeze; Hopefully to simply be renamed 1.3.0
+ 1.3.0: Shoot for May 16, 1998 Release!
- 1.3b6: Tagged APACHE_1_3b6. Possible release 4/20
+ 1.3b7: In development
+ 1.3b6: Tagged APACHE_1_3b6. Announced and Released 4/20/98
+
2.0 : In pre-alpha development, see apache-2.0 repository
Guidelines:
@@ -162,16 +164,16 @@
* What do we call the binary: apache or httpd? Under UNIX
it's httpd, under Win32 it's apache.
apache-httpd: Ken +1
- leave it apache: +1 Brian, Ralf, Martin
+ leave it apache: +1 Brian, Ralf, Martin, Jim
* Maybe a http_paths.h file? See
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1: Brian, Paul, Ralf, Martin
+ +0: Jim (not for 1.3.0)
* Release builds: Should we provide Configuration or not?
Should we 'make all suexec' in src/support?
- Ken +1 (possible suexec path issue, though)
- Brian +1
+ +1: Brian, Jim, Ken +1 (possible suexec path issue, though)
* root's environment is inherited by the Apache server. Jim & Ken
think we should recommend using 'env' to build the
@@ -219,12 +221,6 @@
best interest to continue to support Unix to its utmost, and not delay
a release of 1.3.0 waiting for WIN32 issues to be resolved.
- Proposal: the next release should be named 1.3b6, and labelled "release
- candidate on unix, beta on NT". The release after that will be
- called 1.3.0 "stable on unix, beta on NT".
- +1: Jim, Ralf, Randy, Brian, Martin
- +0:
-
Notes:
Randy: I would also argue that 1.3b6 is _not_ stable. I've been
having real fits keeping it alive on a dual processor
@@ -233,8 +229,17 @@
* Should we re-enable nagle now that we're non-buffering CGIs? See
various
messages from Marc in March 98.
- * Should we list the operating system's generic name (e.g. Irix, Win32)
in
- SERVER_VERSION?
+ * Listing the operating system's generic name (e.g. Irix, Win32) in
+ SERVER_VERSION:
+ o Looks like we want to do this...
+ Implementation: New API function, ap_add_version_component()
+ that takes a 'const char *' and tacks it onto the end
+ of the string returned by ap_get_server_version().
+
+ o Debate:
+ Unix:Win32:OS/2 in '()' comment
+ +1: Jim, Martin, Alexei
+ Irix:AIX:FreeBSD in '()' comment
Win32 specific issues:
