coar 98/06/09 14:09:29
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
I'm -1 on the new method only because of the "usr/local/apache"
and no-source points. It's not a veto, it's an "I don't like this"
vote.
Revision Changes Path
1.421 +6 -4 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.420
retrieving revision 1.421
diff -u -r1.420 -r1.421
--- STATUS 1998/06/09 15:50:03 1.420
+++ STATUS 1998/06/09 21:09:27 1.421
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
of PRs say they cannot find the httpd :-(
Pros: <gets filled tomorrow>
Cons: <gets filled tomorrow>
- Status: Ralf -0
+ Status: Ralf -0, Ken +0
2. The way other projects release binary tarballs, i.e.
a package containing the installed (binary) files.
@@ -174,11 +174,13 @@
- packs the stuff together from ./apache-root only!!
Already known discussion points:
- should there be a prefix usr/local/apache in
- the tarball or not because some people think
- its useful while others dislike it a lot.
+ the tarball or not? Some people think
+ it's useful while others dislike it a lot.
+ - it doesn't include the source.
+ - should suexec be prebuilt in a binary tarball?
Pros: <gets filled tomorrow>
Cons: <gets filled tomorrow>
- Status: Ralf +1, Martin +1
+ Status: Ralf +1, Martin +1, Ken -1 (not a veto)
* Redefine APACHE_RELEASE. Add another 'bit' to signify whether
it's a beta or final release. Maybe 'MMNNFFRBB' which means:
