randy       98/12/09 13:26:20

  Modified:    src      Configure
               src/helpers TestCompile
  Log:
  Fix a rare case where our use of 'make' would fail or yield bogus
  results if Configure was called from a Makefile shell. Default to 'make'
  if MAKE is not in the enviroment.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.311     +8 -1      apache-1.3/src/Configure
  
  Index: Configure
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/Configure,v
  retrieving revision 1.310
  retrieving revision 1.311
  diff -u -r1.310 -r1.311
  --- Configure 1998/12/06 16:14:17     1.310
  +++ Configure 1998/12/09 21:26:14     1.311
  @@ -744,6 +744,13 @@
   esac
   
   ####################################################################
  +## set this if we haven't
  +##
  +if [ ".${MAKE}" = . ]; then
  +    MAKE='make'; export MAKE
  +fi
  +
  +####################################################################
   ## Show user what OS we came up with
   ##
   echo " + configured for $OS platform"
  @@ -1725,7 +1732,7 @@
   ## it uses ugly looking built-in directory walk messages
   ## while we are already using our own messages
   ##
  -if [ "x`make -v 2>/dev/null | grep 'GNU Make'`" = "x" ]; then
  +if [ "x`${MAKE} -v 2>/dev/null | grep 'GNU Make'`" = "x" ]; then
        MFLAGS_STATIC=
   else
        MFLAGS_STATIC=--no-print-directory
  
  
  
  1.22      +1 -1      apache-1.3/src/helpers/TestCompile
  
  Index: TestCompile
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/helpers/TestCompile,v
  retrieving revision 1.21
  retrieving revision 1.22
  diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22
  --- TestCompile       1998/12/03 01:03:46     1.21
  +++ TestCompile       1998/12/09 21:26:19     1.22
  @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
   EOF
   
   # Now run that Makefile
  -eval "make $TARGET >/dev/null $ERRDIR"
  +eval "${MAKE} ${TARGET} >/dev/null $ERRDIR"
   
   # And see if dummy exists and is executable, if so, then we
   # assume the condition we are testing for is good
  
  
  

Reply via email to