randy 99/01/04 17:03:05
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Commit some votes.
Note: I don't view these as total vetos, but just votes for and against.
Revision Changes Path
1.588 +5 -3 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.587
retrieving revision 1.588
diff -u -r1.587 -r1.588
--- STATUS 1999/01/04 14:35:52 1.587
+++ STATUS 1999/01/05 01:03:03 1.588
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1.3 STATUS:
- Last modified at [$Date: 1999/01/04 14:35:52 $]
+ Last modified at [$Date: 1999/01/05 01:03:03 $]
Release:
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
Already known discussion points:
- should src/httpd be renamed or not because a lot
of PRs say they cannot find the httpd :-(
- Status: Ralf -0, Ken +0
+ Status: Ralf -0, Ken +0, Randy -1
2. The way some other projects release binary tarballs, i.e.
a package containing the installed (binary) files.
@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
- the paths don't match the original Apache style, nor the Win32
paths
- should suexec be prebuilt in a binary tarball?
- Status: Ralf +1, Martin +1, Roy -1, Ken +1 (IFF source is included,
+ Status: Randy, +1, Ralf +1, Martin +1, Roy -1,
+ Ken +1 (IFF source is included,
there's no usr/local/apache prefix in the tarball, AND the
old-style [common with Win32] paths are used)
@@ -83,6 +84,7 @@
Status: Roy +1, Jim +1 (still need to define which modules
are built)
Ralf -0 (I dislike mixed source+binary tarballs)
+ Randy -1 (those wanting binary dists don't want source)
Documentation that needs writing:
