lars 99/03/20 06:35:24
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Add some more TODOs to the list...
Revision Changes Path
1.651 +29 -3 apache-1.3/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /export/home/cvs/apache-1.3/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.650
retrieving revision 1.651
diff -u -r1.650 -r1.651
--- STATUS 1999/03/20 12:32:25 1.650
+++ STATUS 1999/03/20 14:35:22 1.651
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
1.3 STATUS:
- Last modified at [$Date: 1999/03/20 12:32:25 $]
+ Last modified at [$Date: 1999/03/20 14:35:22 $]
Release:
@@ -43,8 +43,6 @@
Documentation that needs writing:
- * manual/content-negotiation.html lacks any information about the
- TCN additions and when the RVSA algorithm is used.
Available Patches:
* Keith Wannamaker's NT multiple services patch
@@ -127,6 +125,31 @@
Needs patch:
+ * MaxRequestsPerChild doesn't count requests, only the
+ number of connections processed.
+ We can either 'fix' it by renaming the directive to
+ MaxConnectionsPerChild or really fix it to actually count
+ the number of requests.
+ Lars: I think we should really fix.
+
+ * mod_access/3821: check_dir_access(), reads a->order[31]
+ => either an if-clause should be added or the M_INVALID changed
+
+ * mod_so/3493: os/unix/os.c dlclose()s objects before module cleanups
+ => this is a subtle thing related to pool cleanups, I think.
+
+ * general/3872: util_script.c doubles up Set-Cookie headers
+ => needs review by the protocol guys! Roy?
+
+ * os-linux/3531: Bad file number: flock; Exiting
+ => When I remember correctly we had such reports also in the past.
+ Some Linux guys should check this.
+
+ * mod_rewrite/3874: RewriteLock doesn't work for virtual hosts
+ => When I find time, I can look at this. But I would appreciate
+ when someone other already can dive into this. My opinion
+ is already appended to the PR.
+
* get_path_info bug; ap_get_remote_host should be ap_vformatter instead.
See: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@@ -166,6 +189,9 @@
See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Open issues:
+
+ * general/3787: SERVER_PORT is always 80 if client comes to any port
+ => needs review by the protocol guys, I think.
* Someone other than Dean has to do a security/correctness review on
psprintf(), bprintf(), and ap_snprintf(). In particular these routines
