Thats what I mean William :D, that is after the project group make a vote on their dev@, the PMC or PPMC and or Mentors in case of a podling is *encouraged* to share this on concom@ as a wider public channel.
By *encouraged*, IDK whether it is better to make as *SHOULD* or a *MUST*, I mean do we want to *manage* and/or *control*/*organize* such event in a centralized way through ConCom or only it is preferable to make it go through ConCom. Thoughts ? On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/1/2011 10:28 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >> >> This is actually happens already, like the meet-up of OpenEJB(ers) in >> France and Itally happened this and last year. It was all managed on >> the dev@ of OpenEJB. > > +1 - however we strongly encourage these groups to communicate to the > wider foundation as a whole. > > For example, TrafficServer decided to hold a f2f. When this was mentioned > to ConCom, httpd/apr projects expressed interest and so this became a > slightly larger event with further benefit to the ASF. > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour Author of (WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 2.0 User Guide) http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247585.html - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour - Blog: http://tadabborat.blogspot.com ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less than your best." - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship "Stay hungry, stay foolish." - Steve Jobs
