Doesn't that make more reasonable to turn Camel In Action track into Integration and maybe Messaging and Integration track ?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Nick Burch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > >> I just proposed a few talks on ActiveMQ under "Camel in Action" track. If >> those are accepted, I think it'd be better to have a separate "Messaging" >> track for these and other potentially related talks. >> > > We can broaden tracks out if there's interest - tracks at the moment are > based on the submissions received from projects, and not all projects > responded... > > If you think it'd be a good thing for the community to broaden it, and if > the person down to be track chair for the track does to, we can make the > change. Check with them, check with the communities, and let us know if the > consensus is to do that! > > (Whether you can have a separate track depends on the submissions > received. The tracks so far are provisional, and will only go ahead if they > get enough good talks proposed. If you have a great, late idea for a track, > and it gets enough submissions, we can accept it, but it may have to be at > the expense of another track that didn't get many good submissions to it...) > > Nick > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
