On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:19 AM, J.Lance Wilkinson wrote:

> Steve Holden wrote:
>> For the moment we are on both. Lanyrd does allow you to create a personal 
>> schedule, but apparently only through the mobile (iPhone, Android) apps they 
>> promote. Lanyrd is more modern, and I suspect that 
> 
>       Don't find any Lanyrd mobile apps in the Google play store; went
>       to m.lanyrd.com and indeed there's a mobile optimized website
>       there but nothing to suggest it has the ability to build any
>       personal schedule either.
> 
http://lanyrd.com/mobile/, but I think they are taking a few liberties with the 
phrase "personal schedule," since there doesn't appear to be any way of 
flagging sessions for individual attendance. As a conference organizer this 
feedback is invaluable.

>> over the long haul they will overtake Crowdvine, because they seem able to 
>> make more effective use of web APIs, they are better known, and don't expect 
>> the individual users to do as much work.
>> regards
>> Steve
>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> For whatever it's worth, Lanyrd has the advantage that more people have 
>>> heard of it, and CrowdVine is superior in every other way, especially the 
>>> itinerary planning tools.
>>> 
>       Most conferences I've attended (e.g., Brainshare, Adobe Max)
>       had their own web-based personal scheduling tool.  Never used
>       Crowdvine before Apachecon, never used Lanyrd before yesterday.
>       Personal scheduling is about the only reason I'd used either
>       since almost everything else is back on the main conference
>       site.
> 
Looks like you'll be going with Crowdvine for the moment, then.

regards
Steve Holden [email protected] +1 571 484 6266              @holdenweb
--
Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/
Conferences and technical event management at http://theopenbastion.com/

Next event:    ApacheCon NA 2013: Feb 26-28     http://na.apachecon.com/
Community events: Barcamp Feb 24  Hackathon Feb 25   Development Mar 1/2







Reply via email to