To be honest I think I may have spoken too soon. Anthony and yourself  
have convinced me that my concerns are trivial of not non-existent.

Thanks again! I'm a big fan of all the work you've all put into APE! :)

Lorren

On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Nicolas Trani <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Using mootools in the developpement of APE JSF saved us a lot of time
> (ajax request, Class, Events, array & object functions). As it use a
> special build of mootools for example the $ operator is not included  
> in
> this build. MooTools build of APE JSF "only" contains Core, Browser,
> Array, Function, String, Hash, Event, Class, Request, it's 1680  
> lines of
> codes (MooTools full is about 4329 lines of code). So it's only  
> include
> what i realy need in the JSF.
>
> Writing the APE JSF was is something really complex, and i am  
> working on
> a new development pattern for the future version of APE JSF. For now i
> still have many things to clarify before start talking about it. But
> i'll write an article and wait for feedback before starting to work on
> it. But i think for this future version I'll not use a framework and
> start by creating a "Request framework".
>
> I am always happy to hear some feedback about the JSF. Thanks.
>
> Regards.
>
>
> Lorren Biffin a écrit :
>> Primarily my reasoning is based on the added requirement of loading
>> mootools into the page. (i.e. making an additional resource call).
>> This worry is not so prevalent as I use a resource aggregation /  
>> cache
>> tool for JS / CSS anyhow. I use frameworks only when needed to save  
>> on
>> development time / resource load. I don't have a need to modify the
>> JSF at the moment and the size of the JSF feels trivial, so reading- 
>> in
>> mootools for this reason alone feels silly / awkward.
>>
>> Secondarily, I dislike giving the $ operator to mootools w/o a great
>> reason to do so, as jQuery is usually my framework of choice when I
>> use one.
>>
>> I have nothing against Mootools, it just feels unusual to require it
>> for an unrelated project to handle (what feels like) a trivial task.
>>
>> I also understand that my reasons for wanting a purely APE
>> implementation of the JSF are likely trivial in the wider scope of  
>> the
>> APE project as a whole, which is why I suggest crowd-sourcing the
>> development. :)
>>
>> All-in-all though, this won't stop me from using APE in it's current
>> state.. It's all preference and I'm happy to take things as they  
>> come.
>> You guys are doing a great job and I wouldn't want to ask more of you
>> than you're already generously giving to us. :)
>>
>> Lorren Biffin
>> (425) 522-2673
>> http://twitter.com/lorrenbiffin
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Chavarria
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>    Could you bring your reasons for such a thing?
>>
>>    Thanks :)
>>    --
>>    John Chavarria - CEO / Designer
>>    Weelya - improve the Web
>>
>>    +33 (0) 4.67.169.778
>>    +33 (0) 6.43.56.00.83
>>
>>    Twitter : @jchavarria / @weelya
>>
>>    32 Rue du Faubourg Boutonnet
>>    34090 Montpellier
>>
>>
>>    http://www.ape-project.org/
>>    http://www.weelya.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>    On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Lorren <[email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>        Ideally I would like to see an APE library independent of any
>>        particular JS framework.
>>
>>        Maybe this could be crowd-sourced to the APE community as a  
>> Weelya
>>        backed initiative? I'm sure there would be much interest and  
>> could
>>        potentially bring this idea to fruition much sooner than if
>>        you did it
>>        in-house. :)
>>
>>        On Dec 11, 6:09 pm, Nicolas Trani <[email protected]
>>        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> mootools is only used by the APE JSF Core that runs into an
>>        iframe. It
>>> use a specific build of mootools to be more light. As it run
>>        into an
>>> iframe you can use any framework on your website the APE JSF
>>        Client
>>> communicate with the Core.
>>>
>>> A "[your framework name here]" Core is not planed by the APE
>>        team (for
>>> now) as it will be verry hard to maintains two version of
>>        the Core.
>>> Mayebe in the future APE JSF will use his own framework.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Lorren wrote:
>>>> Is there a non-mootools version of the JSF planned?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Trani - D veloppeur web
>>> Weelya - Improve the web
>>> 32 rue du faubourg boutonnet
>>> 34090 Montpellier
>>> Tel : 04 67 169 778http://www.weelya.com
>>
>>        --
>>        You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>> Google
>>        Groups "APE Project" group.
>>        To post to this group, send email to
>>        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] 
>> >
>>        To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>        [email protected]
>>        <mailto:ape-project%[email protected]>
>>        For more options, visit this group at
>>        http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
>>        ---
>>        APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
>>        Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
>>        Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>    Groups "APE Project" group.
>>    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>    <mailto:[email protected]>
>>    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>    [email protected]
>>    <mailto:ape-project%[email protected]>
>>    For more options, visit this group at
>>    http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
>>    ---
>>    APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
>>    Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
>>    Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "APE Project" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
>> ---
>> APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
>> Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
>> Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "APE Project" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
> ---
> APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
> Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
> Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "APE Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
---
APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/

Reply via email to