Ok, if your are getting each APE.Log as expected 0 for Gandalf and 1 for
Frodo, that means your APE-SERVER logic (HTTP and getContent) is working
as expected => does allow or does not allow to past.
Also it means that each logic-block will send the cmd.sendResponse as it
should do for each case.
When you said.. "then it goes to the page with javascript errors in both
cases..."
Do you mean errors in your BROWSER (login page, etc) ?
If you are getting JS-errors in your SERVER that errors should be shown
into the APE.LOG.
Do you have errors there?
About the bind error.... not sure how it is used outside Mootools. Are
you using a mootools class in the server-side?
What bind should do is to "bring" the hook-connect scope (i.e. variables
"param" and "cmd") "visible" inside the getContent function..
so you can cmd.user.setProperty without getting the undefined error
On 01/23/2012 04:04 PM, utan wrote:
> ok,
> from your appointed test, if '0' run the code 'Gandalf: You will not
> past.' if I run '1' Frodo: Run away!!
> then the it goes to the page with javascript errors in both cases..
> one catch .bin(this) is not working so return 0 isnt doing anything..
> ;(
>
> On Jan 23, 1:40 pm, Erick Romero <err...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ups... I made an mistake in the double-quotes.. fixed now:
>>
>> Try
>>
>> request.getContent(function(result){
>>
>> Ape.log('Result: "' + result + '"');
>>
>> if(result == 0){
>> Ape.log('- Gandalf: You will not past..');
>> cmd.sendResponse('ERR', {'code': 1001, 'value':'User
>> BANNED'});
>> return 0;
>> }
>> else {
>> Ape.log('- Frodo: Run away!!');
>> cmd.user.setProperty('name', params.name);
>> cmd.user.setProperty('ip', cmd.ip);
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> }).bind(this);
>>
>> Modify your PHP file to output manually the result and make two test:
>>
>> First
>> <?php echo '0' ?>
>>
>> Second
>> <?php echo '1' ?>
>>
>> And let me know what your are getting in your APE log for each test.
>>
>> Note:
>> I don't know if you are missing the point, but in your function copied
>> below you are including
>>
>> if(result != ""){
>>
>> that means that php is sending something, so in good theory the
>> if-inside logic should allow to past instead of send the sendResponse error
>>
>> On 01/23/2012 03:12 PM, utan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Erick
>>> I have it just like you suggested and still let me go all the way..
>>> request.getContent(function(result){
>>> if(result != ""){
>>> Ape.log(result);
>>> cmd.sendResponse('ERR', {'code': 1001, 'value':'User BANNED'});
>>> return 0;
>>> }else{
>>> cmd.user.setProperty('name', params.name);
>>> cmd.user.setProperty('ip', cmd.ip);
>>> return 1;
>>> }
>>> }).bind(this);
>>> the only differences there is , is that your have a more recent build
>>> than me, I think I have 111 or something along those lines..
>>> I am frustrated..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "APE Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to ape-project@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ape-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
---
APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
