On 11 July 2010 22:22, Jacob Nordfalk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> 2010/7/11 Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]>
>
>>
>>  <section-rules>
>>    <rule>
>>      <pattern>
>>        <pattern-item n="adj"/>
>>        <pattern-item n="n"/>
>>      </pattern>
>>      <action>
>>        <exception>
>>          <test>
>>            <equal caseless="yes">
>>              <clip pos="2" side="sl" part="lem"/>
>>              <lit v="bar"/>
>>            </equal>
>>          </test>
>>        </exception>
>
> Now, I do understand why you chose that way of writing it (its the easiest
> way to implement), but if we adopt <exception> I it would make more sense to
> make the exception a part of the <pattern> element, like this:

Pattern exceptions is what LanguageTool uses, and there's scope for
*also* having that, but I'm interested in runtime-based exceptions
that have access to all matched words, to check for agreement.

-- 
<Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil.
<Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to