Hi,

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 09:58, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> Per Tunedal <per.tune...@operamail.com> čálii:
> 
> > Hi Mikel,
> > Would you include it in the Java-versions, if I make a back-port of
> > swe-dan to sv-da?
> 
> As mentioned, you don't need a backport, you just need to remove the CG
> From the pipeline. I don't know how the modes files are represented in
> the omegaT plugin, but presumably there is somewhere in it that says
> 
> "lt-proc swe-dan.automorf.bin"
> "cg-proc swe-dan.rlx.bin"
> "apertium-tagger -g swe-dan.prob"
> 
> etc.; and then you just remove the "cg-proc" bit and leave the rest, and
> it should still run.
> 
> > Is it a requirement that the new version would be "released"? What would
> > qualify the new version of sv-da as a "release"? 
> 
> If we are to serve it from the official channels, yes,

-- snip--

Yes, please.

> 
> -Kevin

Per Tunedal

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to