Hello
I found some strange paradigms in apertium-fra-por.por.dix on witch I do
big changes, but they are also at least in es-pt pair and in the monodix
of the "languages" branch.
<pardef n="cabeça__n">
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="mf"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="mf"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
<pardef n="caixa__n">
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
<pardef n="m__n">
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sp"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
For analysis, it seems to give 2 results, one of them including the other,
and for generation, only caixa__n seems coherent to me.
There are also in this language pair these paradigms :
<pardef n="accionista__n">
<e><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="mf"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="mf"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
<pardef n="caos__n">
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sp"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
that I prefer completing like this :
<pardef n="accionista__n">
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="mf"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="mf"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
<e r="RL"><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e r="RL"><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
<e r="RL"><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e r="RL"><p><l>s</l> <r><s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
<pardef n="caos__n">
<e><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sp"/></r></p></e>
<e r="RL"><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
<e r="RL"><p><l/> <r><s n="n"/><s n="m"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
</pardef>
So, is there any reason to use cabeça__n caixa__n and m__n and if not (question
for Portuguese speakers) what gender(s) or number(s) are really allowed for
the words using these paradigms ,
--------------------------------
Bernard Chardonneau (France)
Phone : [33] 9 72 36 32 90
GSM phone : [33] 7 69 46 16 31
Multilingual websites for my free softwares :
http://libremail.free.fr and http://libremail.tuxfamily.org
http://cyloop.tuxfamily.org (mainly translated with Apertium)
My general website (in french only)
http://bech.free.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned
dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an
account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and
projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition.
http://sdm.link/oxford
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
