Hey Tino,

Should be good now. Apologies. And yes both directions should be usable.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Tino Didriksen <tino.didrik...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> configure.ac and Makefile.am disagree on what's LANG1 and LANG2.
> configure.ac claims the pair is ukr-rus, but Makefile.am says rus-ukr.
>
> I assume Makefile.am's LANG1 and LANG2 need updating to match configure.ac,
> but I think this needs looking at by the devs as there's a few places
> either direction is explicitly mentioned, e.g. apertium_rus_ukrdir
> and apertium_rus_ukr_DATA.
>
> There's also some formal errors in the XML files, so the pair doesn't even
> build...
>
> -- TD
>
>
> On 18 September 2017 at 11:24, Tino Didriksen <tino.didrik...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'll take care of it.
>>
>> But, I note that modes.xml says both rus→ukr and ukr→rus are to be
>> installed - that's intentional? Both directions are release-level usable?
>>
>> -- Tino Didriksen
>>
>> On 15 September 2017 at 19:35, John Lyell <jjly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Tino,
>>>
>>> Fran told me to message you that Rus-ukr is now error free, and ready to
>>> be released in some form. The coverage is still not very high, but it
>>> cleared testvoc check.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> John Lyell
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
John Lyell
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to