Missatge de Flammie <flam...@iki.fi> del dia dg., 5 d’ag. 2018 a les 14:54:
>
> [...]
>
> There is a -signed weight system in e.g. openfst that was added exactly
> for this intuition of weights, so it operates on R-, min, - instead of
> R+, max, +, maybe it could be an ok solution?
>
>
You mean still having "bigger weights, worse" but using negative numbers
(which, in this case would be that "smaller abs(x)" would be worse (as
they're actually bigger), but then we would be consistent with lexical
selection?
That would work, I guess. In any case, as long as there's a reason to do it
the way it is now, I'm OK. It was more an "out of curiosity" question, and
some bias towards consistency that I have, than a real concern.
We just need to make sure that this is properly documented.
Thanks!
--
< Xavi Ivars >
< http://xavi.ivars.me >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
