Hi Daniyar, No, there isn't any problem to have different pipelines for different language pairs. In fact, there are lots of different possibilities. Take a look to the mode file for different language pairs (especially, old and new ones) and you'll see. In any case, I'm not sure that there should be any substantial differences between the Kazakh-Russian and the Kazakh-Turkish pipeline, except that the Turkish morphologic analysis and generation will be done with HFST and the Russian with lttoolbox.
Hèctor El dj., 14 març 2019, 17.46, Daniyar Nariman via Apertium-stuff < apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> va escriure: > Hi Sevilay, > > In my message, I meant that Kazakh and Turkish languages are similar in > terms of affixes and sentence structure, and Kazakh and Russian are more > different. So if I will increase the translation quality of the first pair, > by adding some additional functionality to the pipeline, there is a chance > that the same might not work on the second pair. Finally, the question is, > Is this pipeline has to be the same for all language pairs, or it can > differ? > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sevilay Bayatlı <sevilaybaya...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2019 1:13:18 PM > *To:* apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > *Subject:* Re: [Apertium-stuff] Fwd: RBMT from Kazakh to Turkish > > Hi Daniyar, > , > Could tell us how can increase accuracy on one pair and decrease for other > pair by modifying some parts of pipeline? > > Sevilay > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:26 AM Ilnar Salimzianov <il...@selimcan.org> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: RBMT from Kazakh to Turkish >> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:07:42 +0000 >> From: Daniyar Nariman <n.dani...@innopolis.ru> >> To: il...@selimcan.org <il...@selimcan.org> >> >> >> >> Dear Ilnar Salimzianov, >> >> >> My name is Nariman. I am a third-year bachelor student at >> Innopolis University(Russia, Tatarstan). I am studying Data Science and >> really interested in disciplines such as machine learning, natural >> language processing, information retrieval etc. >> >> >> Recently I read your paper, RBMT from Kazakh to Turkish, which was >> published in EAMT 2018. It was really interesting to read. The thing is, >> I am applying to GSoC(Google Summer of Code) this year to Apertium, but >> I am still thinking on the topic which I would like to deal with. One of >> the topics was to bring the defined language pair to state-of-the-art >> quality and I would like to deal with Kazakh-Turkish pair as the >> Kazakh language my mother tongue and I studied the Turkish language in >> the high school for 5 years. >> >> >> I would like to ask If there any restrictions on how to increase the >> quality of this pair? >> >> Excluding adding a large number of rules or by expanding the >> dictionary(taken for granted). For instance by optimizing the algorithms >> given in the pipeline. I am asking this question because by modifying >> some part of the pipeline, we can increase accuracy on our pair of >> languages, but decrease on another pair and constructing a different >> pipeline for different pairs is not a good idea in my opinion. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Daniyar Nariman >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
