Сәлем Данияр, A couple important note, before I look at your proposal is the following:
Evaluation for RBMT isn't to verify that every rule works, but to have a passing "testvoc": http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Testvoc . We have a particular strategy for performing testvoc for morphologically rich languages like Kazakh, Turkish, and Tatar. Ilnar can tell you more about the mechanics of it, but it would be good to interact with us about it in real time—e.g. on IRC. Also, you should not be "implementing the transfer rules for tur-kaz direction" and planning to "share it with [us] very soon". This is not how open-source software development usually works. The mentors should be able to virtually "look over your shoulder". That is, you should be working in a public repository where we can see what you've been doing. The main reason is for your benefit: we can step in to help you out if we notice systematic problems or the like. And also, very importantly, while you're working, you should really be in IRC. It's good practice for what we would expect over the summer, and it also makes you more visible to the entire community, including a wider range of potential mentors! -- Jonathan пн, 1 апр. 2019 г. в 15:39, Daniyar Nariman via Apertium-stuff < apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net>: > Hello everyone, > > As we discussed earlier with some mentors, for now, I decided to take > kaz-tur and kaz-tat language pairs and make them work in the opposite > direction. So here is the draft of my proposal. > > > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Narimann/GSOC_2019_proposal:_Kazakh-Turkish_and_Turkish-Kazakh > > > > In my workplan, I allocated a time(week 9,10,11,12) for testing purposes, > to check if everything is fine and bring some corrections if needed. > > > > Is this kind of workplan fine or should I change it? > > > Regarding to the coding challenge, for now, I am implementing the transfer > rules for tur-kaz direction. I will share it with you very soon. > > > Another point is that I can not guarantee that in my final evaluation > these two pairs will work stable, as I do not know how much time it can > take to cover all the rules. So for now, maybe I should focus only on one > pair, for this summer, to guarantee it works stable? > > > If you have any suggestions or comments, let me know, I appreciate it. > > > Thanks in advance > > > Best Regards, > > Nariman > > > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
