If it is fair, I'm fine with it, it just doesn't make sense to me. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 09:56 Scoop Gracie <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So it seems fair that an arbitrary (at least IMO) requirement is placed on > voters? > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 09:55 Scoop Gracie <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Okay, I have asked for write access on the phenny repo and have never >> received it. >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 09:33 Saurabh Rai <srbh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The ones who are new to the organisation doesn't get to vote this time? >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:01 PM Mikel L. Forcada <m...@dlsi.ua.es> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> A by-laws change should be done by the assembly of committers (even if >>>> the by-laws don't specify clearly). >>>> >>>> Mikel >>>> >>>> El 26/2/20 a les 18:09, Scoop Gracie ha escrit: >>>> > May users without PMC or committer status propose a PMC vote? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mikel L. Forcada http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/ >>>> Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes InformĂ tics >>>> Universitat d'Alacant >>>> E-03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig >>>> Spain >>>> Office: +34 96 590 9776 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff