If it is fair, I'm fine with it, it just doesn't make sense to me.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 09:56 Scoop Gracie <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So it seems fair that an arbitrary (at least IMO) requirement is placed on
> voters?
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 09:55 Scoop Gracie <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Okay, I have asked for write access on the phenny repo and have never
>> received it.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020, 09:33 Saurabh Rai <srbh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The ones who are new to the organisation doesn't get to vote this time?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:01 PM Mikel L. Forcada <m...@dlsi.ua.es>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A by-laws change should be done by the assembly of committers (even if
>>>> the by-laws don't specify clearly).
>>>>
>>>> Mikel
>>>>
>>>> El 26/2/20 a les 18:09, Scoop Gracie ha escrit:
>>>> > May users without PMC or committer status propose a PMC vote?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mikel L. Forcada  http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/
>>>> Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes InformĂ tics
>>>> Universitat d'Alacant
>>>> E-03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig
>>>> Spain
>>>> Office: +34 96 590 9776
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to