I am begging the moderator for this conversation. Please unsubscribe me from this list. Or please tell me how to.
-- Ram On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:03 AM Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> wrote: > And, in the meantime, here you have updated images for apertium/base and > apertium/apy. They'll build on any commit to master, plus once a week > apertium/base > > To use them, the same way as it's done with Docker Hub images > > docker pull ghcr.io/apertium/apy:latest > > > > Missatge de Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> del dia dt., 14 de des. > 2021 a les 14:30: > >> While looking back at this, I realized it's been more than 7 months that >> we haven't published any image to DockerHub, to the point that using >> apertium/apy:latest as a base image may not work in some cases (due to >> using a quite old debian version, being oldstable instead of stable now). >> >> For now, I've added another Github Action that will build and push to the >> GitHub Container Registry, and I'll do the same to push "apertium/base". >> >> I'll wait for Sushain's answer to also push those images to Docker Hub >> >> >> >> Missatge de Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> del dia dj., 9 de des. >> 2021 a les 23:02: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been doing a bit of cleanup on apertium-apy, and realized that >>> Travis hasn't been working for a while. >>> >>> To solve for it, I did an initial integration with GithubActions. >>> >>> I haven't spend too much time on it (Tino mentioned on IRC he's working >>> on a better CI for all modules) but I didn't want to allow merges with >>> tests failing. >>> >>> I'd love if those of you who have more expertise on Apy could take a >>> look at this: >>> >>> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-apy/pull/184 >>> >>> Other things I've seen not properly working on that repo: >>> - Pushes to dockerhub >>> - Pushes to Pypi? >>> - Not sure if with my changes I broke the code coverage check >>> >>> If there are no objections, I'll probably merge it in the next couple of >>> days. Even if this is just an starting point, it should be already better >>> than what we had (no checks running at all) >>> -- >>> < Xavi Ivars > >>> < http://xavi.ivars.me > >>> >> >> >> -- >> < Xavi Ivars > >> < http://xavi.ivars.me > >> > > > -- > < Xavi Ivars > > < http://xavi.ivars.me > > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
