Money, money, money: They Want It!
http://members.tripod.com/~VicBils/
The Money Trail
Rothschild is quoted as saying,
"I don't
care who the government is, let me control the money and I will control
the
country."
...
And, so it goes. The enemies to your freedom
do not necessarily lurk behind closed doors in Washington D.C.
(although you
will find many there), nor are they necessarily engaged in some
nafarious
conspiracy plotting the overthrow of government.
No, the enemies of your
freedom live next door and are found in every city and town in America.
"We have met the enemy, and they are
us." And, while there is a conspiracy [An agreement,
manifesting
itself in words or deeds, by which two or more persons confederate to
do an
unlawful act, or to use unlawful to do an act which is lawful. - From
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)], they do not want
to
overthrow the government - they want to change government for their own
agenda
and they want you to pay for it.
In
1954 The Ford Foundation President H. Rowan
Gaither told Norman Dodd, investigator for Congressman Reece's
Committee, that
their objective "was to alter our life in the
United
States so that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."
The Soviet Union no longer exists as we knew it. What has emerged is a
much
larger globalist entity.
Virtually every major name
in banking from Rockefeller to Rothschild to Robert McNamara (president
of The
World Bank) has spoken of the reality of an interlocking global economy
- that
what happens on Wall Street one minute is felt in London or Tokyo the
next,
that the complex jigsaw puzzle of world economy is moving into an
oscillating
ball that will eventually unify nations and currencies in the global
marketplace, and that the economic forces of the earth are moving
relentlessly
toward a unified world system.
If Rothschild was right
about controlling the money, you control the country, then it is pretty
easy to
see how Communism can fail so conveniently for the New World
Order and how basically the same people who were communists then,
are now Socialist
Democrats and still running
things.
The
average American Citizen isn't going to give
up his Constitution for some World Government too easily. We and our
ancestors
have fought too long and shed too much blood for it to give up easily.
The plan is for Americans
to give up their freedom willingly. Socialist reform is the only way
that a one
world order can be established without a direct military confrontation.
"We
can't be so fixated
on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..."
Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993,
page 2A)
They want "your
money."
For the love of money is
a root of all
kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the
faith and
pierced themselves with many griefs. - 1 Timothy 6:10
Much
of the hostility toward private wealth
comes from the hatred of its ability to insulate the citizen from the
will of
the state. Money empowers resistance; it gives one the ability to buy
some gold
coins, for example, and thereby hold a measure of independence from the
monetary monopoly of the state; to send children to a private school
and avoid
the brainwashing of the public education monopoly; to open a foreign
bank
account and provide oneself with protection against legal confiscation
schemes.
Government
Sponsored Racketeering
Why do you suppose the federal government waged what was
essentially
an all-out war on entrepreneurs early in the century? The enemy was
degradingly
called the "mob" and their product was alcohol and gambling. The
socialists in government won that war and the federal government now
controls
and profits from the burgeoning alcohol and gambling business.
Putting fear into the minds of its citizens and
falsifying the facts have always been the modus operandi of those
wanting to
install a Socialist-Democratic society in America. The word
"survival" is never far from the lips of those who wish to impose
state power in order to protect us from disaster, named or unnamed.
The
buzzword of the
nineties is "crisis."
Suppose that we were to enter a major depression as bad
or worse than 1929. Then suppose a party comes along and says "Vote for us and we will take you into the
New
World
Order, have world trade, put you to work again." Do you
think
if you and your children were starving that you might be willing to
give up
your freedom so that you might feed them? Well, that scenario may not
be in the
far too distant future.
It seems the current rage
is a Y2K
Crisis that some predict will cause widespread outages of
computers
controlling everything from the banks to electric utilities. For some,
namely
lawyers, they see it as a gold mine. "This is the tobacco, the silicone
breast implant, and the asbestos abatement problem all rolled into one
-- times
three," said David Stewart, who is not a lawyer, but is traveling the
country advising lawyers on the opportunities awaiting them. The
Gartner Group
in January estimated the costs of possible Year 2000 litigation would
exceed $1
trillion, and the Senate Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem
has
identified litigation as one of its seven priorities.
We are told we have a "health
care
crisis" - justifying the government takeover of one-seventh of
the
U.S. economy. It was the so-called "health care crisis" that forced
most Americans into health-maintenance organizations or other kinds of
managed
care plans. Now we're told that because the country has attained most
of the
savings (read "profits") it could from the transition, health care
costs are likely to double over the next decade.
We are told we have a "ecological crisis" -
justifying the government to impose far
reaching new regulations on businesses.
We hear of a "crisis of family values" and that "it
takes
more than a family to raise children." The Children's Defense Fund
(CDF), which promotes an amoral approach to sex education and other
means of
destroying the very moral values which most parents want to pass on to
their
children, agrees with the Clinton's and wants to redefine the family
believing
government can serve as surrogate parents (the "village").
That means that kids would no
longer be primarily accountable to their parents. To whom would they be
accountable to? The answer, of course, is the state. The benevolent
state. The
"VILLAGE," then, would transcend the Orwellian "Big
Brother" role and become surrogate parent. It would grant your children
"rights" and be their legal guardian.
Believing that it takes
more than a family to raise children, Clinton's Big Government,
"Village", has turned the rhetoric to focus on children. In almost
every speech, on about any topic, in just about any context, Bill
Clinton uses
that "powerful" emotion-filled statement,"for
the children."
We have a "crisis in the education of our
children" - bringing on humanist solutions through the control and
manipulation of our childrens minds.
We have a "hate
crime
crisis," so Attorney General Janet Reno wants us all to get our
minds right. In her own chilling words, "the Justice Department and the
Department of Education will soon distribute a hate crimes prevention
manual to
help teachers get young people to understand that they should celebrate
their
differences and not fight over them." Homosexual activists are already
in
the schools ... soon they may get your tax dollars to teach your
children, too.
We have a "pediatric
disease crisis" fueling the governments takeover of the tobacco
industry. Of course, it too is being justified as "for the children.
